Marriage at the Summit: Response to the Commentaries

Eli J Finkel, Grace M. Larson, Kathleen L. Carswell, Chin Ming Hui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article serves as a response to the 13 commentaries on the target article, which introduced the suffocation model of marriage in America. This reply has four main sections. First, it presents an elaborated version of the suffocation model that was inspired by the commentaries. Second, it addresses three areas of significant disagreement that emerged as we digested the commentaries. Third, it examines the circumstances under which being instrumental for one's spouse's needs benefits the self. And fourth, it takes strides toward the development of a mathematically formal version of the suffocation model. It concludes with a discussion of the ways in which policymakers, clinicians, and individual Americans can capitalize upon the suffocation model to strengthen marriage and, in doing so, bolster personal well-being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-145
Number of pages26
JournalPsychological Inquiry
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Marriage at the Summit: Response to the Commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this