Measurement Characteristics of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation

John D. Peipert*, Ron D. Hays, Satoru Kawakita, Jennifer L. Beaumont, Amy D. Waterman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Kidney transplant is the best treatment for most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but proportionally few ESRD patients receive kidney transplant. To make an informed choice about whether to pursue kidney transplant, patients must be knowledgeable of its risks and benefits. To reliably and validly measure ESRD patients' kidney transplant knowledge, rigorously tested measures are required. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation (KART). Methods. We administered 17 transplant knowledge items to a sample of 1294 ESRD patients. Item characteristics and scale scores were estimated using an Item Response Theory graded response model. Construct validity was tested by examining differences in scale scores between patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving various types of transplant education. Results. Item Response Theory modeling suggested that 15 items should be retained for the KART. This scale had a marginal reliability of 0.75 and evidenced acceptable reliability (>0.70) across most of its range. Construct validity was supported by the KART's ability to distinguish patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving different types of kidney transplant education, including talking to doctors/medical staff (effect size [ES], 0.61; P < 0.001), reading brochures (ES, 0.45; P < 0.001), browsing the internet (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001), and watching videos (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001). Conclusions. The final 15-item KART can be used to determine the kidney transplant knowledge levels of ESRD patients and plan appropriate interventions to ensure informed transplant decision making occurs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-572
Number of pages8
JournalTransplantation
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Kidney Transplantation
Transplants
Chronic Kidney Failure
Kidney
Education
Pamphlets
Aptitude
Medical Staff
Psychometrics
Internet
Reading
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Peipert, John D. ; Hays, Ron D. ; Kawakita, Satoru ; Beaumont, Jennifer L. ; Waterman, Amy D. / Measurement Characteristics of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation. In: Transplantation. 2019 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 565-572.
@article{fb9dadae38b540f2997106784613b40f,
title = "Measurement Characteristics of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation",
abstract = "Background. Kidney transplant is the best treatment for most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but proportionally few ESRD patients receive kidney transplant. To make an informed choice about whether to pursue kidney transplant, patients must be knowledgeable of its risks and benefits. To reliably and validly measure ESRD patients' kidney transplant knowledge, rigorously tested measures are required. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation (KART). Methods. We administered 17 transplant knowledge items to a sample of 1294 ESRD patients. Item characteristics and scale scores were estimated using an Item Response Theory graded response model. Construct validity was tested by examining differences in scale scores between patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving various types of transplant education. Results. Item Response Theory modeling suggested that 15 items should be retained for the KART. This scale had a marginal reliability of 0.75 and evidenced acceptable reliability (>0.70) across most of its range. Construct validity was supported by the KART's ability to distinguish patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving different types of kidney transplant education, including talking to doctors/medical staff (effect size [ES], 0.61; P < 0.001), reading brochures (ES, 0.45; P < 0.001), browsing the internet (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001), and watching videos (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001). Conclusions. The final 15-item KART can be used to determine the kidney transplant knowledge levels of ESRD patients and plan appropriate interventions to ensure informed transplant decision making occurs.",
author = "Peipert, {John D.} and Hays, {Ron D.} and Satoru Kawakita and Beaumont, {Jennifer L.} and Waterman, {Amy D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0000000000002349",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "565--572",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Measurement Characteristics of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation. / Peipert, John D.; Hays, Ron D.; Kawakita, Satoru; Beaumont, Jennifer L.; Waterman, Amy D.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 103, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 565-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement Characteristics of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation

AU - Peipert, John D.

AU - Hays, Ron D.

AU - Kawakita, Satoru

AU - Beaumont, Jennifer L.

AU - Waterman, Amy D.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Background. Kidney transplant is the best treatment for most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but proportionally few ESRD patients receive kidney transplant. To make an informed choice about whether to pursue kidney transplant, patients must be knowledgeable of its risks and benefits. To reliably and validly measure ESRD patients' kidney transplant knowledge, rigorously tested measures are required. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation (KART). Methods. We administered 17 transplant knowledge items to a sample of 1294 ESRD patients. Item characteristics and scale scores were estimated using an Item Response Theory graded response model. Construct validity was tested by examining differences in scale scores between patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving various types of transplant education. Results. Item Response Theory modeling suggested that 15 items should be retained for the KART. This scale had a marginal reliability of 0.75 and evidenced acceptable reliability (>0.70) across most of its range. Construct validity was supported by the KART's ability to distinguish patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving different types of kidney transplant education, including talking to doctors/medical staff (effect size [ES], 0.61; P < 0.001), reading brochures (ES, 0.45; P < 0.001), browsing the internet (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001), and watching videos (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001). Conclusions. The final 15-item KART can be used to determine the kidney transplant knowledge levels of ESRD patients and plan appropriate interventions to ensure informed transplant decision making occurs.

AB - Background. Kidney transplant is the best treatment for most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, but proportionally few ESRD patients receive kidney transplant. To make an informed choice about whether to pursue kidney transplant, patients must be knowledgeable of its risks and benefits. To reliably and validly measure ESRD patients' kidney transplant knowledge, rigorously tested measures are required. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge Assessment of Renal Transplantation (KART). Methods. We administered 17 transplant knowledge items to a sample of 1294 ESRD patients. Item characteristics and scale scores were estimated using an Item Response Theory graded response model. Construct validity was tested by examining differences in scale scores between patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving various types of transplant education. Results. Item Response Theory modeling suggested that 15 items should be retained for the KART. This scale had a marginal reliability of 0.75 and evidenced acceptable reliability (>0.70) across most of its range. Construct validity was supported by the KART's ability to distinguish patients who had spent less than 1 and 1 hour or longer receiving different types of kidney transplant education, including talking to doctors/medical staff (effect size [ES], 0.61; P < 0.001), reading brochures (ES, 0.45; P < 0.001), browsing the internet (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001), and watching videos (ES, 0.56; P < 0.001). Conclusions. The final 15-item KART can be used to determine the kidney transplant knowledge levels of ESRD patients and plan appropriate interventions to ensure informed transplant decision making occurs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062100191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062100191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002349

DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002349

M3 - Article

C2 - 29965952

AN - SCOPUS:85062100191

VL - 103

SP - 565

EP - 572

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 3

ER -