Measurement of sustainment of prevention programs and initiatives: The sustainment measurement system scale

Lawrence A. Palinkas, Chih Ping Chou, Suzanne E. Spear, Sapna J. Mendon, Juan Villamar, C. Hendricks Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Enhancing the sustainability of evidence-based prevention programs for mental and behavioral health requires tools for measuring both sustainability determinants and sustainment outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop the Sustainment Measurement System Scale (SMSS) and to assess its reliability and construct validity for measuring both determinants and outcomes of efforts to sustain prevention programs and initiatives. Methods: A 42-item scale comprised of items identified from qualitative data collected from 45 representatives of 10 programs and 8 SAMHSA program officers was administered to 186 representatives of 145 programs funded by 7 SAMHSA prevention grant initiatives. Cronbach's alphas were used to determine inter-item reliability. Convergent validity was assessed by comparisons of a global measure of sustainment with current SAMHSA-funding status and continued operation in the same form. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparisons of sustainability determinants with whether or not the program had undergone adaptations. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a 35-item model fit to the data. Cronbach's alpha was.84 for the sustainment outcome construct and ranged from.70 to.93 for the sustainability determinant constructs. All of the determinant constructs were significantly associated with sustainment outcome individual and global measures for the entire sample (p < 0.01 to 0.001) and for community-based programs and programs with a substance abuse focus (p < 0.05 to 0.001). Convergent validity was supported by significant associations between the global sustainment measure and current SAMHSA funding status and continued operation in the same form (p < 0.001). Four of the sustainability determinant constructs (responsive to community needs; coalitions, partnerships, and networks; organizational staff capability; and evaluation, feedback, and program outcomes) were also significantly associated with current SAMHSA funding status (p < 0.5 to 0.01). With the exception of organizational staff capability, all sustainability determinants were unrelated to program adaptation as predicted. Conclusions: The SMSS demonstrated good reliability and convergent and discriminant validity in assessing likelihood of sustainment of SAMHSA funded prevention programs and initiatives. The measure demonstrates potential in identifying predictors of program sustainment and as a tool for enhancing the likelihood of successful sustainment through ongoing evaluation and feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number71
JournalImplementation Science
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2020

Keywords

  • Behavioral health
  • Measurement
  • Prevention
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement of sustainment of prevention programs and initiatives: The sustainment measurement system scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this