Abstract
Fertility intentions—intentions regarding whether and when to have children—predict reproductive health outcomes. Measuring fertility intentions is difficult, particularly during macrostructural shocks, for at least two reasons: (1) fertility intentions may be especially volatile during periods of uncertainty and (2) macrostructural shocks may constrain data collection. We propose a set of indicators that capture how a macrostructural shock directly alters fertility intentions, with a particular focus on the Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. We advance the conceptualization and construct of fertility intentions measures in three ways. First, we demonstrate the value of direct questions about whether women attributed changes in fertility intentions to the pandemic. Second, we highlight the importance of a typology that delineates fertility postponement, advancement, foregoing, and indecision. Third, we demonstrate the importance of incorporating a granular time window within a two-year period to capture short-term changes to fertility intentions. We exemplify the value of our proposed measures using survey data from a probabilistic sample of women aged 18–34 in Pernambuco, Brazil. We discuss the self-reported change in intentions due to Covid in wave 1 as well as panel change across waves. We further ground our contributions by uncovering important variations by social origin and parity.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 161-180 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Studies in Family Planning |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Funding
This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Grant R01HD091257 awarded to P.I. L. Marteleto; and under Grant P2CHD042849 awarded to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin. This study was conducted under Institutional Review Board approval #2018-01-0055 from the University of Texas at Austin and the Brazilian National Commission for Research Ethics (also known as CONEP, or Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa) study approval CAAE: 34032920.1.0000.5149. We thank the editor and editorial board of Studies and Family Planning and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Grant R01HD091257 awarded to P.I. L. Marteleto; and under Grant P2CHD042849 awarded to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Demography
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)