TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality of Care
T2 - Discharge Self-Care Functional Status Quality Measure
AU - Pardasaney, Poonam K.
AU - Deutsch, Anne
AU - Iriondo-Perez, Jeniffer
AU - Ingber, Melvin J.
AU - McMullen, Tara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Objective: To describe the calculation and psychometric properties of the discharge self-care functional status quality measure implemented in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Quality Reporting Program on October 1, 2016. Design: Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients from 38 IRFs that participated in the CMS Post-Acute Care Payment Reform Demonstration were included in this cohort study. Data came from the Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation Item Set, IRF–Patient Assessment Instrument, and Medicare claims. For each patient, we calculated an expected discharge self-care score, risk-adjusted for demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. The performance score of each IRF equaled the percentage of patient stays where the observed discharge self-care score met or exceeded the expected score. We assessed the measure's discriminatory ability across IRFs and reliability. Setting: IRFs. Participants: Medicare FFS patients aged ≥21 years (N=4769). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Facility-level discharge self-care quality measure performance score. Results: A total of 4769 patient stays were included; 57% of stays were in women, and 12.1% were in patients aged <65 years. Stroke was the most common diagnosis (21.8%). The mean±SD performance score was 55.1%±16.6% (range, 25.8%–100%). About 54% of IRFs had scores significantly different from the percentage of stays that met or exceeded the expected discharge self-care score in the overall demonstration sample. The quality measure showed strong reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of.91. Conclusions: The discharge self-care quality measure showed strong discriminatory ability and reliability, representing an important initial step in evaluation of IRF self-care outcomes. A wide range in performance scores suggested a gap in quality of care across IRFs. Future work should include testing the measure with nationwide data from all IRFs.
AB - Objective: To describe the calculation and psychometric properties of the discharge self-care functional status quality measure implemented in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Quality Reporting Program on October 1, 2016. Design: Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients from 38 IRFs that participated in the CMS Post-Acute Care Payment Reform Demonstration were included in this cohort study. Data came from the Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation Item Set, IRF–Patient Assessment Instrument, and Medicare claims. For each patient, we calculated an expected discharge self-care score, risk-adjusted for demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. The performance score of each IRF equaled the percentage of patient stays where the observed discharge self-care score met or exceeded the expected score. We assessed the measure's discriminatory ability across IRFs and reliability. Setting: IRFs. Participants: Medicare FFS patients aged ≥21 years (N=4769). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Facility-level discharge self-care quality measure performance score. Results: A total of 4769 patient stays were included; 57% of stays were in women, and 12.1% were in patients aged <65 years. Stroke was the most common diagnosis (21.8%). The mean±SD performance score was 55.1%±16.6% (range, 25.8%–100%). About 54% of IRFs had scores significantly different from the percentage of stays that met or exceeded the expected discharge self-care score in the overall demonstration sample. The quality measure showed strong reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of.91. Conclusions: The discharge self-care quality measure showed strong discriminatory ability and reliability, representing an important initial step in evaluation of IRF self-care outcomes. A wide range in performance scores suggested a gap in quality of care across IRFs. Future work should include testing the measure with nationwide data from all IRFs.
KW - Inpatients
KW - Outcome assessment (health care)
KW - Quality of health care
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Self care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019643306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019643306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.023
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 28363701
AN - SCOPUS:85019643306
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 99
SP - 1035
EP - 1041
JO - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
JF - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
IS - 6
ER -