Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "Perspective is everything"

Candace Y. Parker-Autry, Matthew D. Barber, Kimberly Kenton, Holly E. Richter*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over 10 years have passed since the first US National Institutes of Health consensus panel considered the standardization of definitions of pelvic floor conditions and the criteria utilized for reporting pelvic floor research study outcomes. The literature is replete with pelvic floor outcome studies; however, a consistent standardized approach to the evaluation of patients and characterization of outcomes is still needed. The purpose of this overview is to describe how the use of outcome measures has evolved over time and to attempt to help readers utilize the best measures for their clinical and research needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Keywords

  • Pelvic floor disorder research
  • Urogynecologic surgical outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "Perspective is everything"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this