Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects.

D. F. Cella*, D. S. Tulsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

423 Scopus citations

Abstract

While it is recognized that quality of life is ultimately as important as quantity of life, efforts to implement quality of life measurement often fail. Two basic reasons for that failure include: 1) definitional differences, where different investigators attribute different meaning to the term and, as a result, are measuring different endpoints; and 2) insufficient information about available measures, which can lead to improper test selection and unnecessary regeneration of new items. Included in this paper is a table that reviews many available quality of life measures that have been designed for, or frequently used with, people with cancer. Proper selection of measures and supplementary questions is an important first step toward a successful evaluation of quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalOncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
Volume4
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this