TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms for Employee Mobility Between Organizations
T2 - A Network Analysis of Faculty Turnover in Communication, 2013 to 2022
AU - Xu, Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Organizations compete for scarce resources such as talent. The mobility of employees between organizations means that the inflow side acquires resources at the expense of the outflow side. This study understands employee turnover from one place to another as a mobility network where directed edges indicate migration flows between organizations. Using observational data on the turnover of tenure-line communication faculty in 129 U.S. universities from 2013 to 2022, this paper investigates the formation mechanisms of the interorganizational mobility network. The results show that the creation of migration flows is driven by transitive closure, but not by cyclic closure. Community cohesion is not a driving force of network formation. While low-prestige universities are more likely to be sources of faculty mobility than high-prestige universities, migration flows are commonly observed between organizations with similar levels of prestige. Additionally, the probability of faculty mobility between universities first decreases and then increases with their geographic distance.
AB - Organizations compete for scarce resources such as talent. The mobility of employees between organizations means that the inflow side acquires resources at the expense of the outflow side. This study understands employee turnover from one place to another as a mobility network where directed edges indicate migration flows between organizations. Using observational data on the turnover of tenure-line communication faculty in 129 U.S. universities from 2013 to 2022, this paper investigates the formation mechanisms of the interorganizational mobility network. The results show that the creation of migration flows is driven by transitive closure, but not by cyclic closure. Community cohesion is not a driving force of network formation. While low-prestige universities are more likely to be sources of faculty mobility than high-prestige universities, migration flows are commonly observed between organizations with similar levels of prestige. Additionally, the probability of faculty mobility between universities first decreases and then increases with their geographic distance.
KW - ERGM
KW - mobility
KW - network formation
KW - organizational networks
KW - turnover
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169565029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169565029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00936502231190950
DO - 10.1177/00936502231190950
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169565029
SN - 0093-6502
JO - Communication Research
JF - Communication Research
ER -