TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms underlying cross-orientation suppression in cat visual cortex
AU - Priebe, Nicholas J.
AU - Ferster, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to M.P. Stryker and J.A. Movshon for comments on the manuscript. We also thank J. Hanover for helpful discussions. Supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (EY-014499 and EY-04726).
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - In simple cells of the cat primary visual cortex, null-oriented stimuli, which by themselves evoke no response, can completely suppress the spiking response to optimally oriented stimuli. This cross-orientation suppression has been interpreted as evidence for cross-orientation inhibition: synaptic inhibition among cortical cells with different preferred orientations. In intracellular recordings from simple cells, however, we found that cross-oriented stimuli suppressed, rather than enhanced, synaptic inhibition and, at the same time, suppressed synaptic excitation. Much of the suppression of excitation could be accounted for by the behavior of geniculate relay cells: contrast saturation and rectification in relay cell responses, when applied to a linear feed-forward model, predicted cross-orientation suppression of the modulation (F1) component of excitation evoked in simple cells. In addition, we found that the suppression of the spike output of simple cells was almost twice the suppression of their synaptic inputs. Thus, cross-orientation suppression, like orientation selectivity, is strongly amplified by threshold.
AB - In simple cells of the cat primary visual cortex, null-oriented stimuli, which by themselves evoke no response, can completely suppress the spiking response to optimally oriented stimuli. This cross-orientation suppression has been interpreted as evidence for cross-orientation inhibition: synaptic inhibition among cortical cells with different preferred orientations. In intracellular recordings from simple cells, however, we found that cross-oriented stimuli suppressed, rather than enhanced, synaptic inhibition and, at the same time, suppressed synaptic excitation. Much of the suppression of excitation could be accounted for by the behavior of geniculate relay cells: contrast saturation and rectification in relay cell responses, when applied to a linear feed-forward model, predicted cross-orientation suppression of the modulation (F1) component of excitation evoked in simple cells. In addition, we found that the suppression of the spike output of simple cells was almost twice the suppression of their synaptic inputs. Thus, cross-orientation suppression, like orientation selectivity, is strongly amplified by threshold.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645351673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645351673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nn1660
DO - 10.1038/nn1660
M3 - Article
C2 - 16520737
AN - SCOPUS:33645351673
SN - 1097-6256
VL - 9
SP - 552
EP - 561
JO - Nature neuroscience
JF - Nature neuroscience
IS - 4
ER -