Media use predictors of online political efficacy among Internet users in five Arab countries

Justin D. Martin*, Ralph J. Martins, Shageaa Naqvi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Informed by research on the uses and gratifications of the Internet for political activity, this study examines predictors of online political efficacy among Internet users in five Arab countries (N = 4029): Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Lebanon, Qatar, and the U.A.E. As predicted, variables presumed to be associated with political dissidence in Arab countries–unemployment, distrust of mainstream media, young age, and feeling country is on the wrong track–were not positively associated with online political efficacy. Counter to what was hypothesized, however, Internet reliance and social media use were not strongly or consistently associated with online political efficacy in the five countries. Rather, the strongest predictors of efficacy were a belief in news media credibility, print media use (newspapers, magazines, and books), belief in the reliability of online information, and tolerance of free speech online. Findings align with some prior research on predictors of online political efficacy, but not with common presumptions of the role the Internet plays among Arab publics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-146
Number of pages18
JournalInformation Communication and Society
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Funding

This work was supported by Qatar Foundation Fund under its National Priorities Research Program [grant number 7-1757-5-261].

Keywords

  • Arab countries
  • Internet
  • Online political efficacy
  • survey research
  • uses and gratifications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Media use predictors of online political efficacy among Internet users in five Arab countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this