Abstract
We estimate a bargaining model of competition between hospitals and managed care organizations (MCOs) and use the estimates to evaluate the effects of hospital mergers. We find that MCO bargaining restrains hospital prices significantly. The model demonstrates the potential impact of coinsurance rates, which allow MCOs to partly steer patients toward cheaper hospitals. We show that increasing patient coinsurance tenfold would reduce prices by 16 percent. We find that a proposed hospital acquisition in Northern Virginia that was challenged by the Federal Trade Commission would have significantly raised hospital prices. Remedies based on separate bargaining do not alleviate the price increases.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 172-203 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | American Economic Review |
Volume | 105 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2015 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mergers when prices are negotiated: Evidence from the hospital industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Replication data for: Mergers When Prices Are Negotiated: Evidence from the Hospital Industry
Gowrisankaran, G. (Creator), Nevo, A. (Creator) & Town, R. (Creator), ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2015
DOI: 10.3886/e112908v1, https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/112908/version/V1/view
Dataset