TY - JOUR
T1 - Mergers when prices are negotiated
T2 - Evidence from the hospital industry
AU - Gowrisankaran, Gautam
AU - Nevo, Aviv
AU - Town, Robert
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - We estimate a bargaining model of competition between hospitals and managed care organizations (MCOs) and use the estimates to evaluate the effects of hospital mergers. We find that MCO bargaining restrains hospital prices significantly. The model demonstrates the potential impact of coinsurance rates, which allow MCOs to partly steer patients toward cheaper hospitals. We show that increasing patient coinsurance tenfold would reduce prices by 16 percent. We find that a proposed hospital acquisition in Northern Virginia that was challenged by the Federal Trade Commission would have significantly raised hospital prices. Remedies based on separate bargaining do not alleviate the price increases.
AB - We estimate a bargaining model of competition between hospitals and managed care organizations (MCOs) and use the estimates to evaluate the effects of hospital mergers. We find that MCO bargaining restrains hospital prices significantly. The model demonstrates the potential impact of coinsurance rates, which allow MCOs to partly steer patients toward cheaper hospitals. We show that increasing patient coinsurance tenfold would reduce prices by 16 percent. We find that a proposed hospital acquisition in Northern Virginia that was challenged by the Federal Trade Commission would have significantly raised hospital prices. Remedies based on separate bargaining do not alleviate the price increases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920572102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920572102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1257/aer.20130223
DO - 10.1257/aer.20130223
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84920572102
VL - 105
SP - 172
EP - 203
JO - American Economic Review
JF - American Economic Review
SN - 0002-8282
IS - 1
ER -