Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

Abstract

Many health-related message variations have been described as variations in the framing of the message. What different applications of the term message framing have in common is that, in each case, something gets described in different ways (with researchers having a special interest in the consequences of these different descriptions). But what that “thing” is and how the descriptions of it differ vary across different uses of the term framing. In research on health-related messages, at least three different variations have been described using “framing” as a label.

One concerns variation in consequence-based arguments in persuasive messages. In this kind of framing, what varies is the description of the antecedent or consequent in arguments designed to persuade people to adopt some course of action. For example, the antecedent in an argument designed to encourage sunscreen use might be expressed as “if you wear sunscreen” or “if you don’t wear sunscreen,” and the consequent of such arguments might emphasize sunburns or skin cancer. A second concerns variation in the description of some news event, public policy issue, or health subject. For example, news media might describe obesity as controllable or as something over which one has limited control. A third concerns variation in the description of an attribute of a course of action. For example, a surgical procedure might be described as having a “90% success rate” or a “10% failure rate.”
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOxford Research Encyclopedia
Subtitle of host publicationCommunication
EditorsJon Nussbaum
PublisherOxford University Press
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

news
health
cancer
public policy
event

Cite this

O'Keefe, D. J. (2017). Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging. In J. Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Communication Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.308
O'Keefe, Daniel James. / Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging. Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Communication. editor / Jon Nussbaum. Oxford University Press, 2017.
@inbook{3e12647b4588489faa4a510c0e9d66cf,
title = "Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging",
abstract = "Many health-related message variations have been described as variations in the framing of the message. What different applications of the term message framing have in common is that, in each case, something gets described in different ways (with researchers having a special interest in the consequences of these different descriptions). But what that “thing” is and how the descriptions of it differ vary across different uses of the term framing. In research on health-related messages, at least three different variations have been described using “framing” as a label.One concerns variation in consequence-based arguments in persuasive messages. In this kind of framing, what varies is the description of the antecedent or consequent in arguments designed to persuade people to adopt some course of action. For example, the antecedent in an argument designed to encourage sunscreen use might be expressed as “if you wear sunscreen” or “if you don’t wear sunscreen,” and the consequent of such arguments might emphasize sunburns or skin cancer. A second concerns variation in the description of some news event, public policy issue, or health subject. For example, news media might describe obesity as controllable or as something over which one has limited control. A third concerns variation in the description of an attribute of a course of action. For example, a surgical procedure might be described as having a “90{\%} success rate” or a “10{\%} failure rate.”",
author = "O'Keefe, {Daniel James}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.308",
language = "English (US)",
editor = "Jon Nussbaum",
booktitle = "Oxford Research Encyclopedia",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

O'Keefe, DJ 2017, Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging. in J Nussbaum (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.308

Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging. / O'Keefe, Daniel James.

Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Communication. ed. / Jon Nussbaum. Oxford University Press, 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

TY - CHAP

T1 - Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging

AU - O'Keefe, Daniel James

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Many health-related message variations have been described as variations in the framing of the message. What different applications of the term message framing have in common is that, in each case, something gets described in different ways (with researchers having a special interest in the consequences of these different descriptions). But what that “thing” is and how the descriptions of it differ vary across different uses of the term framing. In research on health-related messages, at least three different variations have been described using “framing” as a label.One concerns variation in consequence-based arguments in persuasive messages. In this kind of framing, what varies is the description of the antecedent or consequent in arguments designed to persuade people to adopt some course of action. For example, the antecedent in an argument designed to encourage sunscreen use might be expressed as “if you wear sunscreen” or “if you don’t wear sunscreen,” and the consequent of such arguments might emphasize sunburns or skin cancer. A second concerns variation in the description of some news event, public policy issue, or health subject. For example, news media might describe obesity as controllable or as something over which one has limited control. A third concerns variation in the description of an attribute of a course of action. For example, a surgical procedure might be described as having a “90% success rate” or a “10% failure rate.”

AB - Many health-related message variations have been described as variations in the framing of the message. What different applications of the term message framing have in common is that, in each case, something gets described in different ways (with researchers having a special interest in the consequences of these different descriptions). But what that “thing” is and how the descriptions of it differ vary across different uses of the term framing. In research on health-related messages, at least three different variations have been described using “framing” as a label.One concerns variation in consequence-based arguments in persuasive messages. In this kind of framing, what varies is the description of the antecedent or consequent in arguments designed to persuade people to adopt some course of action. For example, the antecedent in an argument designed to encourage sunscreen use might be expressed as “if you wear sunscreen” or “if you don’t wear sunscreen,” and the consequent of such arguments might emphasize sunburns or skin cancer. A second concerns variation in the description of some news event, public policy issue, or health subject. For example, news media might describe obesity as controllable or as something over which one has limited control. A third concerns variation in the description of an attribute of a course of action. For example, a surgical procedure might be described as having a “90% success rate” or a “10% failure rate.”

U2 - 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.308

DO - 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.308

M3 - Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary

BT - Oxford Research Encyclopedia

A2 - Nussbaum, Jon

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

O'Keefe DJ. Message Framing Variations in Health and Risk Messaging. In Nussbaum J, editor, Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Communication. Oxford University Press. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.308