Messy Data, Ordered Questions

Mark William Hauser*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A lively debate was witnessed in 2011 about the role of deductive and interpretive approaches in the production of anthropological knowledge, especially as it relates to archaeology. Scholarly output in archaeology this year reflects this concern. First, there is a trend toward furthering our archaeological imagination-finding new ways of asking questions that link the most empirical of research projects with innovative social theory. Second, there is an embracement of the messiness of archaeological data and the conclusions we can reach from it. By looking at the messiness of archaeological data and the limits of knowledge, archaeology asserts itself as an open frontier for anthropological inquiry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-195
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Anthropologist
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Keywords

  • Anthropological archaeology
  • Environment
  • Historical archaeology
  • Identity
  • Power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Messy Data, Ordered Questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this