Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy

Jane M. Garbutt*, Nathaniel J. Soper, William D. Shannon, Anna Botero, Benjamin Littenberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

149 Scopus citations

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether laparoscopic or open appendectomy gives better outcomes for patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Studies were selected from the MEDLINE database, personal files, and meeting abstracts. Eleven of 21 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled effect size estimates were calculated using a random effects model. Laparoscopic appendectomy reduced time to full functioning by 5.48 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.70 to 7.26; p < 0.001), improved postoperative pain at 24 hours measured by a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 by 1.19 points (95% CI -2.14 to -0.24 points; p = 0.014), and decreased the absolute risk for wound infection by 3.2% (95% CI-5.6% to - 0. 8%; p = 0.009). Operating time was increased by 17.12 min (95% CI 14.19 to 20.03; p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the two surgeries for length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and intra-abdominal abscess formation. Laparoscopic appendectomy improves patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-26
Number of pages10
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 6 1999

Keywords

  • Appendectomy
  • Controlled trials
  • Laparoscopy
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this