Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy

Wolfgang Lutz*, Niklaus Stulz, Zoran Martinovich, Scott Leon, Stephen M. Saunders

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systems to provide feedback regarding treatment progress have been recognized as a promising method for the early identification of patients at risk for treatment failure in outpatient psychotherapy. The feedback systems presented in this article rely on decision rules to contrast the actual treatment progress of an individual patient and his or her expected treatment response (ETR). Approaches to predict the ETR on the basis of patient intake characteristics and previous treatment progress can be classified into two broad classes: Rationally derived decision rules rely on the judgments of experts, who determine the amount of progress that a patient has to achieve for a given treatment session to be considered “on track.” Empirically derived decision rules are based on expected recovery curves derived from statistical models applied to aggregated psychotherapy outcomes data. Examples of each type of decision rule and of feedback systems based on such rules are presented and reviewed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-510
Number of pages9
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume19
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Therapeutics
Statistical Models
Treatment Failure
Outpatients

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Longitudinal data analysis
  • Outcomes management
  • Patient-focused psychotherapy research
  • Treatment feedback
  • Treatment progress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Lutz, Wolfgang ; Stulz, Niklaus ; Martinovich, Zoran ; Leon, Scott ; Saunders, Stephen M. / Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy. In: Psychotherapy Research. 2009 ; Vol. 19, No. 4-5. pp. 502-510.
@article{5d30a311729c4568be34d328455cab7d,
title = "Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy",
abstract = "Systems to provide feedback regarding treatment progress have been recognized as a promising method for the early identification of patients at risk for treatment failure in outpatient psychotherapy. The feedback systems presented in this article rely on decision rules to contrast the actual treatment progress of an individual patient and his or her expected treatment response (ETR). Approaches to predict the ETR on the basis of patient intake characteristics and previous treatment progress can be classified into two broad classes: Rationally derived decision rules rely on the judgments of experts, who determine the amount of progress that a patient has to achieve for a given treatment session to be considered “on track.” Empirically derived decision rules are based on expected recovery curves derived from statistical models applied to aggregated psychotherapy outcomes data. Examples of each type of decision rule and of feedback systems based on such rules are presented and reviewed.",
keywords = "Decision making, Longitudinal data analysis, Outcomes management, Patient-focused psychotherapy research, Treatment feedback, Treatment progress",
author = "Wolfgang Lutz and Niklaus Stulz and Zoran Martinovich and Scott Leon and Saunders, {Stephen M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10503300802688486",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "502--510",
journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4-5",

}

Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy. / Lutz, Wolfgang; Stulz, Niklaus; Martinovich, Zoran; Leon, Scott; Saunders, Stephen M.

In: Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 19, No. 4-5, 01.01.2009, p. 502-510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy

AU - Lutz, Wolfgang

AU - Stulz, Niklaus

AU - Martinovich, Zoran

AU - Leon, Scott

AU - Saunders, Stephen M.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Systems to provide feedback regarding treatment progress have been recognized as a promising method for the early identification of patients at risk for treatment failure in outpatient psychotherapy. The feedback systems presented in this article rely on decision rules to contrast the actual treatment progress of an individual patient and his or her expected treatment response (ETR). Approaches to predict the ETR on the basis of patient intake characteristics and previous treatment progress can be classified into two broad classes: Rationally derived decision rules rely on the judgments of experts, who determine the amount of progress that a patient has to achieve for a given treatment session to be considered “on track.” Empirically derived decision rules are based on expected recovery curves derived from statistical models applied to aggregated psychotherapy outcomes data. Examples of each type of decision rule and of feedback systems based on such rules are presented and reviewed.

AB - Systems to provide feedback regarding treatment progress have been recognized as a promising method for the early identification of patients at risk for treatment failure in outpatient psychotherapy. The feedback systems presented in this article rely on decision rules to contrast the actual treatment progress of an individual patient and his or her expected treatment response (ETR). Approaches to predict the ETR on the basis of patient intake characteristics and previous treatment progress can be classified into two broad classes: Rationally derived decision rules rely on the judgments of experts, who determine the amount of progress that a patient has to achieve for a given treatment session to be considered “on track.” Empirically derived decision rules are based on expected recovery curves derived from statistical models applied to aggregated psychotherapy outcomes data. Examples of each type of decision rule and of feedback systems based on such rules are presented and reviewed.

KW - Decision making

KW - Longitudinal data analysis

KW - Outcomes management

KW - Patient-focused psychotherapy research

KW - Treatment feedback

KW - Treatment progress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953170990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953170990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10503300802688486

DO - 10.1080/10503300802688486

M3 - Article

C2 - 19585370

AN - SCOPUS:77953170990

VL - 19

SP - 502

EP - 510

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 4-5

ER -