TY - JOUR
T1 - Methods and global environmental governance
AU - O'Neill, Kate
AU - Weinthal, Erika
AU - Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly R.
AU - Bernstein, Steven
AU - Cohn, Avery
AU - Stone, Michael W.
AU - Cashore, Benjamin
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - This review analyzes the methods being used and developed in global environmental governance (GEG), an applied field that employs insights and tools from a variety of disciplines both to understand pressing environmental problems and to determine how to address them collectively. We find that methods are often underspecified in GEG research. We undertake a critical review of data collection and analysis in three categories: qualitative, quantitative, and modeling and scenario building. We include examples and references from recent studies to show when and how best to utilize these different methods to conduct problem-driven research. GEG problems are often characterized by institutional and issue complexity, linkages, and multiscalarity that pose challenges for many conventional methodological approaches. As a result, given the large methodological toolbox available to applied researchers, we recommend they adopt a reflective, pluralist, and often collaborative approach when choosing methods appropriate to these challenges.
AB - This review analyzes the methods being used and developed in global environmental governance (GEG), an applied field that employs insights and tools from a variety of disciplines both to understand pressing environmental problems and to determine how to address them collectively. We find that methods are often underspecified in GEG research. We undertake a critical review of data collection and analysis in three categories: qualitative, quantitative, and modeling and scenario building. We include examples and references from recent studies to show when and how best to utilize these different methods to conduct problem-driven research. GEG problems are often characterized by institutional and issue complexity, linkages, and multiscalarity that pose challenges for many conventional methodological approaches. As a result, given the large methodological toolbox available to applied researchers, we recommend they adopt a reflective, pluralist, and often collaborative approach when choosing methods appropriate to these challenges.
KW - collaboration
KW - complexity
KW - global environmental governance
KW - linkages
KW - methodological pluralism
KW - problem-focused research
KW - scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887442835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887442835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530
DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84887442835
SN - 1543-5938
VL - 38
SP - 441
EP - 471
JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
ER -