TY - JOUR
T1 - MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive Glioblastoma
T2 - The DIRECTOR Trial
AU - Weller, Michael
AU - Tabatabai, Ghazaleh
AU - Kästner, Bärbel
AU - Felsberg, Jörg
AU - Steinbach, Joachim P.
AU - Wick, Antje
AU - Schnell, Oliver
AU - Hau, Peter
AU - Herrlinger, Ulrich
AU - Sabel, Michael C.
AU - Wirsching, Hans Georg
AU - Ketter, Ralf
AU - Bähr, Oliver
AU - Platten, Michael
AU - Tonn, Jörg C.
AU - Schlegel, Uwe
AU - Marosi, Christine
AU - Goldbrunner, Roland
AU - Stupp, Roger
AU - Homicsko, Krisztian
AU - Pichler, Josef
AU - Nikkhah, Guido
AU - Meixensberger, Jürgen
AU - Vajkoczy, Peter
AU - Kollias, Spyros
AU - Hüsing, Johannes
AU - Reifenberger, Guido
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 AACR.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Purpose: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT!TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-Arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen. Experimental Design: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT!TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m2 per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m2 per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median timeto-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylationspecific PCR. Results: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8-3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8- 7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation. Conclusions: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation.
AB - Purpose: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT!TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-Arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen. Experimental Design: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT!TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m2 per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m2 per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median timeto-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylationspecific PCR. Results: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8-3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8- 7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation. Conclusions: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937939301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937939301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2737
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2737
M3 - Article
C2 - 25655102
AN - SCOPUS:84937939301
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 21
SP - 2057
EP - 2064
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 9
ER -