TY - JOUR
T1 - Microembolic Signals Detected by Transcranial Doppler Predict Future Stroke and Poor Outcomes
AU - Das, Alvin S.
AU - Regenhardt, Robert W.
AU - LaRose, Sarah
AU - Monk, Andrew D.
AU - Castro, Pedro M.
AU - Sheriff, Faheem G.
AU - Sorond, Farzaneh A.
AU - Vaitkevicius, Henrikas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society of Neuroimaging
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although transcranial Doppler detects microembolic signals (MES) in numerous settings, the practical significance of such findings remains unclear. METHODS: Clinical information from ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients (n = 248) who underwent embolic monitoring from January 2015 to December 2018 was obtained. RESULTS: MES were found in 15% of studies and ischemic recurrence was seen in 11% of patients (over 7 ± 6 days). Patients with MES had more lacunes than those without MES (1 ± 3 vs. 1 ± 2, P =.016), were more likely to have ischemic recurrence (37% vs. 6%, P <.001), undergo a future revascularization procedure (26% vs. 10%, P =.005), have a longer length of stay (9 vs. 4 days, P =.043), and have worse functional disability at discharge (modified Rankin Scale 3-6, 66% vs. 34%, P <.001). After controlling for several relevant cofactors, patients with MES were more likely to have ischemic recurrence (HR 4.90, 95% CI 2.16-11.09, P <.001), worse functional disability (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.22-8.99, P =.019), and longer length of stays (β =.202, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: MES may help to risk stratify patients as their presence is associated with ischemic recurrence and worse outcomes.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although transcranial Doppler detects microembolic signals (MES) in numerous settings, the practical significance of such findings remains unclear. METHODS: Clinical information from ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients (n = 248) who underwent embolic monitoring from January 2015 to December 2018 was obtained. RESULTS: MES were found in 15% of studies and ischemic recurrence was seen in 11% of patients (over 7 ± 6 days). Patients with MES had more lacunes than those without MES (1 ± 3 vs. 1 ± 2, P =.016), were more likely to have ischemic recurrence (37% vs. 6%, P <.001), undergo a future revascularization procedure (26% vs. 10%, P =.005), have a longer length of stay (9 vs. 4 days, P =.043), and have worse functional disability at discharge (modified Rankin Scale 3-6, 66% vs. 34%, P <.001). After controlling for several relevant cofactors, patients with MES were more likely to have ischemic recurrence (HR 4.90, 95% CI 2.16-11.09, P <.001), worse functional disability (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.22-8.99, P =.019), and longer length of stays (β =.202, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: MES may help to risk stratify patients as their presence is associated with ischemic recurrence and worse outcomes.
KW - Neurosonology
KW - cerebral emboli
KW - recurrence
KW - stroke
KW - transcranial Doppler sonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087686908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087686908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jon.12749
DO - 10.1111/jon.12749
M3 - Article
C2 - 32648610
AN - SCOPUS:85087686908
SN - 1051-2284
VL - 30
SP - 882
EP - 889
JO - Journal of Neuroimaging
JF - Journal of Neuroimaging
IS - 6
ER -