Abstract
The prospective randomized, placebo-controlled CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial (Alliance) demonstrated a statistically significant overall survival benefit from the addition of midostaurin to standard frontline chemotherapy in a genotypically-defined subgroup of 717 patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The risk of death was reduced by 22% on the midostaurin-containing arm. In this post hoc analysis, we analyzed the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) on this study and also evaluated the impact of 12 4-week cycles of maintenance therapy. CIR analyses treated relapses and AML deaths as events, deaths from other causes as competing risks, and survivors in remission were censored. CIR was improved on the midostaurin arm (HR = 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54–0.93); p = 0.01), both overall and within European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk classification subsets when post-transplant events were considered in the analysis as events. However, when transplantation was considered as a competing risk, there was overall no significant difference between the risks of relapse on the two randomized arms. Patients still in remission after consolidation with high-dose cytarabine entered the maintenance phase, continuing with either midostaurin or placebo. Analyses were inconclusive in quantifying the impact of the maintenance phase on the overall outcome. In summary, midostaurin reduces the CIR.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2539-2551 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Leukemia |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2021 |
Funding
Acknowledgements We thank the patients who participated and their families, the clinical and laboratory research staff members of multiple international cooperative groups, CTEP of the NCI, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. We acknowledge Dr. Francesco Lo-Coco’s and Dr. Clara D. Bloomfield’s key roles in the design and completion of this study. CALGB is now part of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA198171 (to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), U10CA032291, U10CA041287, U10CA077651, U10CA077658, U10CA180791, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN), UG1CA233290, U10CA180836, U10CA180850, U10CA180863 (CCTG), U10CA180867, U10CA180888 (SWOG), and UG1CA233338 [https://acknow ledgments.alliancefound.org]. This study was also supported in part by funds from Novartis. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier number: NCT00651261. This study was conducted at 225 sites in 17 countries. Participating cooperative groups included: Alliance/CALGB, AMLSG, CETLAM, ECOG, EORTC/HOVON, GIMEMA, NCIC, OSHO, PETHEMA, LATAM, SAL, SWOG, ALLG, and individual sites. Alliance/CALGB was the lead group and held the clinical trial data. The study was sponsored in North America by the Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and in non-North American sites by Novartis Pharmaceutical Company. Patients enrolled in the study were randomized with equal probability to the two treatments. These randomizations were double-blinded and were stratified by the FLT3 mutation subgroup: TKD, ITD with mutant allelic ratio <0.7 (low), and ITD with allelic ratio ≥0.7 (high).
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Cancer Research