TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications
T2 - An update
AU - Bretschneider, C. Emi
AU - Jallad, Karl
AU - Paraiso, Marie Fidela R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Edizioni Minerva Medica.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Indication for hysterectomy is most often benign, which includes conditions such as prolapse, abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids and pelvic pain. A broad range of surgical approaches exists for hysterectomy, ranging from open to minimally invasive techniques. Under this minimally invasive umbrella, the following techniques are included: vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy, and variations of those two techniques, such as laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, robotic-assisted hysterectomy, laparo-endoscopic single-site laparoscopic hysterectomy, mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy, and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy. As hysterectomy is being performed increasingly via a minimally invasive route, it is important that gynecologists are familiar with the established as well as emerging techniques for minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Surgical planning is a complex process, which requires an in depth and informed conversation between a patient and her physician. Patient preferences, surgeon skill and indication for surgery all should be taken into consideration when determining the most appropriate surgical approach. This article will review the different routes of MIH. Perioperative considerations will be discussed, as will the advantages and disadvantages of each minimally invasive approach.
AB - Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Indication for hysterectomy is most often benign, which includes conditions such as prolapse, abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids and pelvic pain. A broad range of surgical approaches exists for hysterectomy, ranging from open to minimally invasive techniques. Under this minimally invasive umbrella, the following techniques are included: vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy, and variations of those two techniques, such as laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, robotic-assisted hysterectomy, laparo-endoscopic single-site laparoscopic hysterectomy, mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy, and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy. As hysterectomy is being performed increasingly via a minimally invasive route, it is important that gynecologists are familiar with the established as well as emerging techniques for minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Surgical planning is a complex process, which requires an in depth and informed conversation between a patient and her physician. Patient preferences, surgeon skill and indication for surgery all should be taken into consideration when determining the most appropriate surgical approach. This article will review the different routes of MIH. Perioperative considerations will be discussed, as will the advantages and disadvantages of each minimally invasive approach.
KW - Hysterectomy
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Minimally invasive surgical procedures
KW - Robotics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018170511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018170511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04017-5
DO - 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04017-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28177208
AN - SCOPUS:85018170511
SN - 0026-4784
VL - 69
SP - 295
EP - 303
JO - Minerva Ginecologica
JF - Minerva Ginecologica
IS - 3
ER -