Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity

Alice H Eagly*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Duarte et al.'s arguments for increasing political diversity in social psychology are based on mischaracterizations of social psychology as fundamentally flawed in understanding stereotype accuracy and the effects of attitudes on information processing. I correct their misunderstandings while agreeing with their view that political diversity, along with other forms of diversity, stands to benefit social psychology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere141
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 27 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this