Misunderstanding Law: Undergraduates’ Analysis of Campus Title IX Policies

Kat Albrecht*, Laura Beth Nielsen, Lydia Wuorinen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Colleges and universities are legally required to attempt to prevent and redress sexual violations on campus. Neo-institutional theory suggests that the implementation of law by compliance professionals rarely achieves law’s goals. It is critical in claims-based systems that those who are potential claimants understand the law. This article demonstrates that (a) intended subjects of the law (colleges and universities) interpret and frame the law in very similar ways; (b) resultant policies are complex and difficult to navigate; and (c) university undergraduates in an experimental setting are not able to comprehend the Title IX policies designed to protect them. These findings suggest that current implementations of Title IX policies leave them structurally ineffective to combat sexual assaults on campus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-267
Number of pages21
JournalEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • colleges
  • educational policy
  • law/legal
  • measurements
  • policy
  • quasi-experimental analysis
  • statistics
  • violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Misunderstanding Law: Undergraduates’ Analysis of Campus Title IX Policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this