Mixing methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Validation, contextualization, triangulation, and control

James P. Spillane, Amber Stitziel Pareja, Lisa Dorner, Carol Barnes, Henry May, Jason Huff, Eric Camburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper we described how we mixed research approaches in a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) of a school principal professional development program. Using examples from our study we illustrate how combining qualitative and quantitative data can address some key challenges from validating instruments and measures of mediator variables to examining how contextual factors interact with the treatment. Describing how we transformed our qualitative and quantitative data, we consider how mixing methods enabled us to deal with the two core RCT challenges of random assignment and treatment control critical. Our account offers insights into ways of maximizing the potential of mixing research methods in RCTs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-28
Number of pages24
JournalEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Mixed methods
  • Randomized controlled trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mixing methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Validation, contextualization, triangulation, and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this