Abstract
We offer a theory of the sunk cost fallacy as an optimal response to limited memory. As new information arrives, a decision-maker may not remember all the reasons he began a project. The sunk cost gives additional information about future profits and informs subsequent decisions. The Concorde effect makes the investor more eager to complete projects when sunk costs are high and the pro-rata effect makes the investor less eager. In a controlled experiment we had subjects play a simple version of the model. In a baseline treatment subjects exhibit the pro-rata bias. When we induce memory constraints the effect reverses and the subjects exhibit the Concorde bias.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 35-67 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | American Economic Journal: Microeconomics |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2011 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mnemonomics: The sunk cost fallacy as a memory kludge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Replication data for: Mnemonomics: The Sunk Cost Fallacy as a Memory Kludge
Baliga, S. (Creator) & Ely, J. C. (Creator), ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2011
DOI: 10.3886/e114388, https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/114388
Dataset