Mobile spine chordoma: Results of 166 patients from the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor database

Ziya L. Gokaslan, Patricia L. Zadnik, Daniel M. Sciubba*, Niccole Germscheid, C. Rory Goodwin, Jean Paul Wolinsky, Chetan Bettegowda, Mari L. Groves, Alessandro Luzzati, Laurence D. Rhines, Charles G. Fisher, Peter Pal Varga, Mark B. Dekutoski, Michelle J. Clarke, Michael G. Fehlings, Nasir A. Quraishi, Dean Chou, Jeremy J. Reynolds, Richard P. Williams, Norio KawaharaStefano Boriani

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECT: A chordoma is an indolent primary spinal tumor that has devastating effects on the patient's life. These lesions are chemoresistant, resistant to conventional radiotherapy, and moderately sensitive to proton therapy; however, en bloc resection remains the preferred treatment for optimizing patient outcomes. While multiple small and largely retrospective studies have investigated the outcomes following en bloc resection of chordomas in the sacrum, there have been few large-scale studies on patients with chordomas of the mobile spine. The goal of this study was to review the outcomes of surgically treated patients with mobile spine chordomas at multiple international centers with respect to local recurrence and survival. This multiinstitutional retrospective study collected data between 1988 and 2012 about prognosispredicting factors, including various clinical characteristics and surgical techniques for mobile spine chordoma. Tumors were classified according to the Enneking principles and analyzed in 2 treatment cohorts: Enneking-appropriate (EA) and Enneking-inappropriate (EI) cohorts. Patients were categorized as EA when the final pathological assessment of the margin matched the Enneking recommendation; otherwise, they were categorized as EI. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data (Student t-test, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests). Recurrence and survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients (55 female and 111 male patients) with mobile spine chordoma were included. The median patient follow-up was 2.6 years (range 1 day to 22.5 years). Fifty-eight (41%) patients were EA and 84 (59%) patients were EI. The type of biopsy (p < 0.001), spinal location (p = 0.018), and if the patient received adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001) were significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Overall, 58 (35%) patients developed local recurrence and 57 (34%) patients died. Median survival was 7.0 years postoperative: 8.4 years postoperative for EA patients and 6.4 years postoperative for EI patients (p = 0.023). The multivariate analysis showed that the EI cohort was significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in comparison with the EA cohort (HR 7.02; 95% CI 2.96-16.6; p < 0.001), although no significant difference in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: EA resection plays a major role in decreasing the risk for local recurrence in patients with chordoma of the mobile spine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)644-651
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2016

Funding

Dr. Rhines is a consultant for Stryker and Globus. Dr. Sciubba is a consultant for Medtronic and Depuy-Synthes. Dr. Fisher is a consultant for Medtronic and Nuvasive and receives non-studyrelated clinical or research support from OREF. Dr. Chou is a consultant for Globus, Medtronic, and Orthofix. Ms. Germscheid has a nonfinancial relationship with AOSpine International. Dr. Goodwin is a UNCF-Merck Science Initiative Postdoctoral Fellow and has received an award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. Dr. Dekutoski holds patents with the Mayo Office of International Property and receives clinical or research support from the AO Foundation. We are grateful to the collaborating centers' local clinical research personnel and support staff for their active participation. This study was organized and funded by AOSpine International through the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor, a pathologyfocused working group of up to 10 international spine experts acting on behalf of AOSpine in their domains of scientific expertise. Study support was provided directly through AOSpine's research department and the AO Foundation's clinical investigation documentation unit.

Keywords

  • Chordoma
  • Enneking classification
  • Mobile spine
  • Oncology
  • Recurrence
  • Surgery
  • Survival
  • Tumor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mobile spine chordoma: Results of 166 patients from the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this