Modified forms of allergen immunotherapy

Leslie C. Grammer*, Martha A. Shaughnessy, Roy Patterson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations


There have been many attempts to modify allergens and thus to improve upon conventional immunotherapy, which has been proved effective but has several drawbacks. These include the risk of systemic reactions and the time and cost involved. The modifications have taken three major approaches. One approach, to impede allergen release from the site of deposition, has met with limited success. An example is alum precipitation, which has modestly reduced the number of injections and incidence of systemic reactions. A second approach, to suppress specific IgE production and to induce specific tolerance, has not been successful in man. The third approach, to reduce allergenicity while retaining immunogenicity of allergens, has been the most successful and appears to have the most promise. One example is polymerized allergens, which have been shown to be safe, efficacious, and immunogenic in multiple clinical trials. Other examples include allergoids and glutaraldehyde-treated, tyrosine-adsorbed allergens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-401
Number of pages5
JournalThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
Issue number2 PART 2
StatePublished - Aug 1985

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology


Dive into the research topics of 'Modified forms of allergen immunotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this