TY - JOUR
T1 - Morphological analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma on multidetector row computed tomography
T2 - Implications for treatment response evaluation
AU - Rezai, Pedram
AU - Mulcahy, Mary Frances
AU - Tochetto, Sandra M.
AU - Berggruen, Senta
AU - Yaghmai, Vahid
PY - 2009/10/1
Y1 - 2009/10/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines assume spherical shape of tumors. Morphology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) on multidetector row computed tomography was investigated to evaluate the applicability of RECIST guidelines. METHODS: Study population comprised 16 patients with histologically confirmed localized PAC enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of chemoradiation. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas were segmented on baseline and follow-up multidetector row computed tomography with commercially available software. Tumor volumes (mL), RECIST diameter (mm), volume equivalent sphere diameter (VESD, mm), maximum 3-dimensional diameter (M3DD, mm), and elongation value were obtained. RECIST diameter, VESD and M3DD of the tumors at baseline and follow-up were compared to determine differences. Elongation values were analyzed. The significance level was set at P less than 0.05. RESULTS: Mean volume, RECIST diameter, VESD, M3DD, and elongation for baseline versus follow-up studies were 23.12 mL versus 19.43 mL (P > 0.05), 41.86 mm versus 39.35 mm (P > 0.05), 33.14 mm versus 32.1 mm (P > 0.05), 51.76 mm versus 51.73 mm (P > 0.05), and 0.67 versus 0.76 (P > 0.05), respectively. There was a significant difference at baseline and follow-up between RECIST diameter, VESD, and M3DD (P < 0.05, in all instances). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PACs are not spherical in shape. Evaluation of PAC treatment response based on RECIST guidelines may not be accurate.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines assume spherical shape of tumors. Morphology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) on multidetector row computed tomography was investigated to evaluate the applicability of RECIST guidelines. METHODS: Study population comprised 16 patients with histologically confirmed localized PAC enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of chemoradiation. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas were segmented on baseline and follow-up multidetector row computed tomography with commercially available software. Tumor volumes (mL), RECIST diameter (mm), volume equivalent sphere diameter (VESD, mm), maximum 3-dimensional diameter (M3DD, mm), and elongation value were obtained. RECIST diameter, VESD and M3DD of the tumors at baseline and follow-up were compared to determine differences. Elongation values were analyzed. The significance level was set at P less than 0.05. RESULTS: Mean volume, RECIST diameter, VESD, M3DD, and elongation for baseline versus follow-up studies were 23.12 mL versus 19.43 mL (P > 0.05), 41.86 mm versus 39.35 mm (P > 0.05), 33.14 mm versus 32.1 mm (P > 0.05), 51.76 mm versus 51.73 mm (P > 0.05), and 0.67 versus 0.76 (P > 0.05), respectively. There was a significant difference at baseline and follow-up between RECIST diameter, VESD, and M3DD (P < 0.05, in all instances). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PACs are not spherical in shape. Evaluation of PAC treatment response based on RECIST guidelines may not be accurate.
KW - MDCT
KW - Oncology
KW - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
KW - Segmentation
KW - Tumor morphology
KW - Volumetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349923194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349923194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ac7511
DO - 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ac7511
M3 - Article
C2 - 19531968
AN - SCOPUS:70349923194
SN - 0885-3177
VL - 38
SP - 799
EP - 803
JO - Pancreas
JF - Pancreas
IS - 7
ER -