Motivated mind perception

Treating pets as people and people as animals

Nicholas Epley*, Juliana Schroeder, Adam Waytz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human beings have a sophisticated ability to reason about the minds of others, often referred to as using one's theory of mind or mentalizing. Just like any other cognitive ability, people engage in reasoning about other minds when it seems useful for achieving particular goals, but this ability remains disengaged otherwise. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our ability to reason about the minds of others helps to explain anthropomorphism: cases in which people attribute minds to a wide range of nonhuman agents, including animals, mechanical and technological objects, and supernatural entities such as God. We suggest that engagement is guided by two basic motivations: (1) the motivation to explain and predict others' actions, and (2) the motivation to connect socially with others. When present, these motivational forces can lead people to attribute minds to almost any agent. When absent, the likelihood of attributing a mind to others, even other human beings, decreases. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our theory of mind can help to explain the inverse process of dehumanization, and also why people might be indifferent to other people even when connecting to them would improve their momentary wellbeing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationObjectification and (De)Humanization
Subtitle of host publication60th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
PublisherSpringer New York LLC
Pages127-152
Number of pages26
ISBN (Print)9781461469582
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Publication series

NameNebraska Symposium on Motivation
Volume60
ISSN (Print)0146-7875

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Pets
Theory of Mind
Motivation
Dehumanization

Keywords

  • Anthropomorphism
  • Attribution
  • Dehumanization
  • God
  • Mentalizing
  • Mind perception
  • Motivation
  • Religion
  • Social cognition
  • Theory of mind
  • Wellbeing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Epley, N., Schroeder, J., & Waytz, A. (2013). Motivated mind perception: Treating pets as people and people as animals. In Objectification and (De)Humanization: 60th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 127-152). (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation; Vol. 60). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9-6
Epley, Nicholas ; Schroeder, Juliana ; Waytz, Adam. / Motivated mind perception : Treating pets as people and people as animals. Objectification and (De)Humanization: 60th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Springer New York LLC, 2013. pp. 127-152 (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation).
@inproceedings{0bbffbe93e1744d4b0be2baded3844e4,
title = "Motivated mind perception: Treating pets as people and people as animals",
abstract = "Human beings have a sophisticated ability to reason about the minds of others, often referred to as using one's theory of mind or mentalizing. Just like any other cognitive ability, people engage in reasoning about other minds when it seems useful for achieving particular goals, but this ability remains disengaged otherwise. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our ability to reason about the minds of others helps to explain anthropomorphism: cases in which people attribute minds to a wide range of nonhuman agents, including animals, mechanical and technological objects, and supernatural entities such as God. We suggest that engagement is guided by two basic motivations: (1) the motivation to explain and predict others' actions, and (2) the motivation to connect socially with others. When present, these motivational forces can lead people to attribute minds to almost any agent. When absent, the likelihood of attributing a mind to others, even other human beings, decreases. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our theory of mind can help to explain the inverse process of dehumanization, and also why people might be indifferent to other people even when connecting to them would improve their momentary wellbeing.",
keywords = "Anthropomorphism, Attribution, Dehumanization, God, Mentalizing, Mind perception, Motivation, Religion, Social cognition, Theory of mind, Wellbeing",
author = "Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder and Adam Waytz",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9-6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781461469582",
series = "Nebraska Symposium on Motivation",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
pages = "127--152",
booktitle = "Objectification and (De)Humanization",

}

Epley, N, Schroeder, J & Waytz, A 2013, Motivated mind perception: Treating pets as people and people as animals. in Objectification and (De)Humanization: 60th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 60, Springer New York LLC, pp. 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9-6

Motivated mind perception : Treating pets as people and people as animals. / Epley, Nicholas; Schroeder, Juliana; Waytz, Adam.

Objectification and (De)Humanization: 60th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Springer New York LLC, 2013. p. 127-152 (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation; Vol. 60).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Motivated mind perception

T2 - Treating pets as people and people as animals

AU - Epley, Nicholas

AU - Schroeder, Juliana

AU - Waytz, Adam

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Human beings have a sophisticated ability to reason about the minds of others, often referred to as using one's theory of mind or mentalizing. Just like any other cognitive ability, people engage in reasoning about other minds when it seems useful for achieving particular goals, but this ability remains disengaged otherwise. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our ability to reason about the minds of others helps to explain anthropomorphism: cases in which people attribute minds to a wide range of nonhuman agents, including animals, mechanical and technological objects, and supernatural entities such as God. We suggest that engagement is guided by two basic motivations: (1) the motivation to explain and predict others' actions, and (2) the motivation to connect socially with others. When present, these motivational forces can lead people to attribute minds to almost any agent. When absent, the likelihood of attributing a mind to others, even other human beings, decreases. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our theory of mind can help to explain the inverse process of dehumanization, and also why people might be indifferent to other people even when connecting to them would improve their momentary wellbeing.

AB - Human beings have a sophisticated ability to reason about the minds of others, often referred to as using one's theory of mind or mentalizing. Just like any other cognitive ability, people engage in reasoning about other minds when it seems useful for achieving particular goals, but this ability remains disengaged otherwise. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our ability to reason about the minds of others helps to explain anthropomorphism: cases in which people attribute minds to a wide range of nonhuman agents, including animals, mechanical and technological objects, and supernatural entities such as God. We suggest that engagement is guided by two basic motivations: (1) the motivation to explain and predict others' actions, and (2) the motivation to connect socially with others. When present, these motivational forces can lead people to attribute minds to almost any agent. When absent, the likelihood of attributing a mind to others, even other human beings, decreases. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our theory of mind can help to explain the inverse process of dehumanization, and also why people might be indifferent to other people even when connecting to them would improve their momentary wellbeing.

KW - Anthropomorphism

KW - Attribution

KW - Dehumanization

KW - God

KW - Mentalizing

KW - Mind perception

KW - Motivation

KW - Religion

KW - Social cognition

KW - Theory of mind

KW - Wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885220572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885220572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9-6

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9-6

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781461469582

T3 - Nebraska Symposium on Motivation

SP - 127

EP - 152

BT - Objectification and (De)Humanization

PB - Springer New York LLC

ER -

Epley N, Schroeder J, Waytz A. Motivated mind perception: Treating pets as people and people as animals. In Objectification and (De)Humanization: 60th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Springer New York LLC. 2013. p. 127-152. (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9-6