Abstract
Granting forgiveness demands self-regulation. Distinct modes of self-regulation might therefore produce distinct routes to forgiveness. Self-regulation focused on advancement (or promotion) could motivate forgiveness through the perceived benefits to be attained by repairing a relationship, i.e., one's trust that a partner will provide such benefits rather than further betrayal. In contrast, self-regulation focused on security (or prevention) could motivate forgiveness through the perceived costs of further relationship deterioration, i.e., one's commitment to maintain a relationship upon which one depends and protect against the loss of this relationship. These hypotheses were supported across two studies that: (a) measured and manipulated promotion-focused versus prevention-focused self-regulation, (b) included real and imagined offenses in casual and close relationships, and (c) assessed forgiveness immediately following an offense and after a two-week delay. Trust in a relationship partner more strongly predicted forgiveness among promotion-focused individuals, whereas commitment to this partner more strongly predicted forgiveness among prevention-focused individuals.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 255-268 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2010 |
Keywords
- Commitment
- Forgiveness
- Interpersonal relationships
- Regulatory focus
- Trust
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science