TY - JOUR
T1 - Multifactor clinical score and outcome of mechanical ventilation weaning trials
T2 - Burns Wean Assessment Program
AU - Burns, Suzanne M.
AU - Fisher, Charles
AU - Tribble, Sidenia S.Earven
AU - Lewis, Rose
AU - Merrel, Paul
AU - Conaway, Mark R.
AU - Bleck, Thomas P
PY - 2010/9/1
Y1 - 2010/9/1
N2 - Background: The Burns Wean Assessment Program is a 26-factor weaning assessment worksheet and scoring instru ment used to reduce practice variability in the clinical management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The instrument has been tested in patients in a medical-surgical intensive care unit, but further testing in different populations of adult patients is needed. Objectives: To determine the relationship between Burns Wean Assessment Program scores and outcomes of weaning trials in patients treated with mechanical ventilation for 3 or more days. Methods: For 5 years in 5 adult critical care units (surgical, medical, neurological, thoracic-cardiovascular, and coronary care), advanced practice nurses collected scores within 24 hours of a weaning attempt. All patients were managed similarly by using a multidisciplinary pathway, the Burns Wean Assessment Program checklist, protocols for weaning trials, and sedation guidelines. Results: Of 1889 weaning attempts, 1669 (88%) were successful, and 220 (12%) were unsuccessful. Weaning outcomes did not differ according to sex, but significantly more trials were successful in younger patients than in older patients (P = .002) and in patients in different units (P = .01). Regardless of unit, patients with Burns Wean Assessment Program scores greater than 50 were significantly more likely to be weaned successfully (P = .001) than were patients with lower scores. Conclusions: Systematic tracking of the factors and scores on the Burns Wean Assessment Program may be helpful in care planning and management and in determining weaning potential.
AB - Background: The Burns Wean Assessment Program is a 26-factor weaning assessment worksheet and scoring instru ment used to reduce practice variability in the clinical management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The instrument has been tested in patients in a medical-surgical intensive care unit, but further testing in different populations of adult patients is needed. Objectives: To determine the relationship between Burns Wean Assessment Program scores and outcomes of weaning trials in patients treated with mechanical ventilation for 3 or more days. Methods: For 5 years in 5 adult critical care units (surgical, medical, neurological, thoracic-cardiovascular, and coronary care), advanced practice nurses collected scores within 24 hours of a weaning attempt. All patients were managed similarly by using a multidisciplinary pathway, the Burns Wean Assessment Program checklist, protocols for weaning trials, and sedation guidelines. Results: Of 1889 weaning attempts, 1669 (88%) were successful, and 220 (12%) were unsuccessful. Weaning outcomes did not differ according to sex, but significantly more trials were successful in younger patients than in older patients (P = .002) and in patients in different units (P = .01). Regardless of unit, patients with Burns Wean Assessment Program scores greater than 50 were significantly more likely to be weaned successfully (P = .001) than were patients with lower scores. Conclusions: Systematic tracking of the factors and scores on the Burns Wean Assessment Program may be helpful in care planning and management and in determining weaning potential.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957968572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957968572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4037/ajcc2010273
DO - 10.4037/ajcc2010273
M3 - Article
C2 - 20810418
AN - SCOPUS:77957968572
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 19
SP - 431
EP - 439
JO - American Journal of Critical Care
JF - American Journal of Critical Care
IS - 5
ER -