TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple accountabilities
T2 - development cooperation, transparency, and the politics of unknowing in Tanzania’s health sector
AU - Sullivan, Noelle
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by a Fulbright Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship [grant number P022A070066]. This research could not have been completed without the support of Dr. Faustin Njau. The project was approved by the University of Florida’s Institutional Review Board, and by the Tanzanian Commission for Science and Technology. I am grateful to Susan Erikson, Amanda Logan, Peter Locke, guest editors and anonymous reviewers for insightful feedback. Remaining shortcomings are my own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/3/15
Y1 - 2017/3/15
N2 - Accountability and transparency are considered best practices within development cooperation frameworks characteristic of global health practice today. In this article, I ask: How do accountability and transparency work, and for whom? I develop three main arguments. Drawing on Geissler’s concept ‘unknowing,’ I first demonstrate that global health actors are aware, yet strategically obscure, the instabilities and problematics of data and indicators in Tanzania. Second, I suggest that multiple and contradictory forms of accountability are pursued by global health actors, while this multiplicity is often unspoken in order to render accountability frameworks legitimate to sustain the existing development cooperation system. Third, I argue that foreign and Tanzanian actors within the health sector perpetuate accountability and development cooperation frameworks which are neither cooperative, nor accountable to citizens and purported beneficiaries of aid, because doing so allows actors to pursue interests often unrelated to formal policy goals.
AB - Accountability and transparency are considered best practices within development cooperation frameworks characteristic of global health practice today. In this article, I ask: How do accountability and transparency work, and for whom? I develop three main arguments. Drawing on Geissler’s concept ‘unknowing,’ I first demonstrate that global health actors are aware, yet strategically obscure, the instabilities and problematics of data and indicators in Tanzania. Second, I suggest that multiple and contradictory forms of accountability are pursued by global health actors, while this multiplicity is often unspoken in order to render accountability frameworks legitimate to sustain the existing development cooperation system. Third, I argue that foreign and Tanzanian actors within the health sector perpetuate accountability and development cooperation frameworks which are neither cooperative, nor accountable to citizens and purported beneficiaries of aid, because doing so allows actors to pursue interests often unrelated to formal policy goals.
KW - Tanzania
KW - accountability
KW - ethnographic fieldwork
KW - global health
KW - transparency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002397034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002397034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09581596.2016.1264572
DO - 10.1080/09581596.2016.1264572
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85002397034
SN - 0958-1596
VL - 27
SP - 193
EP - 204
JO - Critical Public Health
JF - Critical Public Health
IS - 2
ER -