TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple layers of diversity govern the cell type specificity of GABAergic input received by mouse subicular pyramidal neurons
AU - Borjas, Nancy Castro
AU - Anstotz, Max
AU - Maccaferri, Gianmaria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - Abstract: The subiculum is a key region of the brain involved in the initiation of pathological activity in temporal lobe epilepsy, and local GABAergic inhibition is essential to prevent subicular-originated epileptiform discharges. Subicular pyramidal cells may be easily distinguished into two classes based on their different firing patterns. Here, we have compared the strength of the GABAa receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents received by regular- vs. burst-firing subicular neurons and their dynamic modulation by the activation of μ opioid receptors. We have taken advantage of the sequential re-patching of the same cell to initially classify pyramidal neurons according to their firing patters, and then to measure GABAergic events triggered by the optogenetic stimulation of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons. Activation of parvalbumin-expressing cells generated larger responses in postsynaptic burst-firing neurons whereas the opposite was observed for currents evoked by the stimulation of somatostatin-expressing interneurons. In all cases, events depended critically on ω-agatoxin IVA- but not on ω-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive calcium channels. Optogenetic GABAergic input originating from both parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing cells was reduced in amplitude following the exposure to a μ opioid receptor agonist. The kinetics of this pharmacological sensitivity was different in regular- vs. burst-firing neurons, but only when responses were evoked by the activation of parvalbumin-expressing neurons, whereas no differences were observed when somatostatin-expressing cells were stimulated. In conclusion, our results show that a high degree of complexity regulates the organizing principles of subicular GABAergic inhibition, with the interaction of pre- and postsynaptic diversity at multiple levels. (Figure presented.). Key points: Optogenetic stimulation of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons (PVs and SOMs) triggers inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in both regular- and burst-firing (RFs and BFs) subicular pyramidal cells. The amplitude of optogenetically evoked IPSCs from PVs (PV-opto IPSCs) is larger in BFs whereas IPSCs generated by the light activation of SOMs (SOM-opto IPSCs) are larger in RFs. Both PV- and SOM-opto IPSCs critically depend on ω-agatoxin IVA-sensitive P/Q type voltage-gated calcium channels, whereas no major effects are observed following exposure to ω-conotoxin GVIA, suggesting no significant involvement of N-type channels. The amplitude of both PV- and SOM-opto IPSCs is reduced by the probable pharmacological activation of presynaptic μ opioid receptors, with a faster kinetics of the effect observed in PV-opto IPSCs from RFs vs. BFs, but not in SOM-opto IPSCs. These results help us understand the complex interactions between different layers of diversity regulating GABAergic input onto subicular microcircuits.
AB - Abstract: The subiculum is a key region of the brain involved in the initiation of pathological activity in temporal lobe epilepsy, and local GABAergic inhibition is essential to prevent subicular-originated epileptiform discharges. Subicular pyramidal cells may be easily distinguished into two classes based on their different firing patterns. Here, we have compared the strength of the GABAa receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents received by regular- vs. burst-firing subicular neurons and their dynamic modulation by the activation of μ opioid receptors. We have taken advantage of the sequential re-patching of the same cell to initially classify pyramidal neurons according to their firing patters, and then to measure GABAergic events triggered by the optogenetic stimulation of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons. Activation of parvalbumin-expressing cells generated larger responses in postsynaptic burst-firing neurons whereas the opposite was observed for currents evoked by the stimulation of somatostatin-expressing interneurons. In all cases, events depended critically on ω-agatoxin IVA- but not on ω-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive calcium channels. Optogenetic GABAergic input originating from both parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing cells was reduced in amplitude following the exposure to a μ opioid receptor agonist. The kinetics of this pharmacological sensitivity was different in regular- vs. burst-firing neurons, but only when responses were evoked by the activation of parvalbumin-expressing neurons, whereas no differences were observed when somatostatin-expressing cells were stimulated. In conclusion, our results show that a high degree of complexity regulates the organizing principles of subicular GABAergic inhibition, with the interaction of pre- and postsynaptic diversity at multiple levels. (Figure presented.). Key points: Optogenetic stimulation of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons (PVs and SOMs) triggers inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in both regular- and burst-firing (RFs and BFs) subicular pyramidal cells. The amplitude of optogenetically evoked IPSCs from PVs (PV-opto IPSCs) is larger in BFs whereas IPSCs generated by the light activation of SOMs (SOM-opto IPSCs) are larger in RFs. Both PV- and SOM-opto IPSCs critically depend on ω-agatoxin IVA-sensitive P/Q type voltage-gated calcium channels, whereas no major effects are observed following exposure to ω-conotoxin GVIA, suggesting no significant involvement of N-type channels. The amplitude of both PV- and SOM-opto IPSCs is reduced by the probable pharmacological activation of presynaptic μ opioid receptors, with a faster kinetics of the effect observed in PV-opto IPSCs from RFs vs. BFs, but not in SOM-opto IPSCs. These results help us understand the complex interactions between different layers of diversity regulating GABAergic input onto subicular microcircuits.
KW - channelrhodopsin
KW - epilepsy
KW - interneuron
KW - network
KW - synaptic transmission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201110423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201110423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1113/JP286679
DO - 10.1113/JP286679
M3 - Article
C2 - 39141819
AN - SCOPUS:85201110423
SN - 0022-3751
VL - 602
SP - 4195
EP - 4213
JO - Journal of physiology
JF - Journal of physiology
IS - 17
ER -