TY - JOUR
T1 - Nanoparticle shape, thermodynamics and kinetics
AU - Marks, L. D.
AU - Peng, L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work would have been impossible without contributions from many others over more than thirty years. LDM would like to particularly thank A Howie and D J Smith for their mentoring of a graduate student who liked to work nights, and E Yoffe and J Dundurs for solving some intractable elasticity problems. A number of graduate students have also contributed to many parts of this work, most notably P M. Ajayan, J Enterkin, Y Lin and E Ringe as well as a postdoc S Patala; thanks also to D Alpay, J E Bonevich, L. Crosby and D. Noraiswamy. Many others have freely contributed time and papers including unpublished work, most notably M Castell, S Iijima, A Kirkland, A Pimpinelli, N Tanaka, P Voorhees and M Yacaman. Parts of this work evolved via collaborative projects with other faculty at Northwestern University, K R Poeppelmeier, P Stair and R Van Duyne. Writing of the paper and funding for LP was supported by the materials Research Center (MRSEC) at Northwestern University, on the grant MRSEC-1121262. The MRSEC is funded through the National Science Foundation; a number of other agencies supported the research which is mentioned in various parts of the paper.
PY - 2016/1/20
Y1 - 2016/1/20
N2 - Nanoparticles can be beautiful, as in stained glass windows, or they can be ugly as in wear and corrosion debris from implants. We estimate that there will be about 70 000 papers in 2015 with nanoparticles as a keyword, but only one in thirteen uses the nanoparticle shape as an additional keyword and research focus, and only one in two hundred has thermodynamics. Methods for synthesizing nanoparticles have exploded over the last decade, but our understanding of how and why they take their forms has not progressed as fast. This topical review attempts to take a critical snapshot of the current understanding, focusing more on methods to predict than a purely synthetic or descriptive approach. We look at models and themes which are largely independent of the exact synthetic method whether it is deposition, gas-phase condensation, solution based or hydrothermal synthesis. Elements are old dating back to the beginning of the 20th century - some of the pioneering models developed then are still relevant today. Others are newer, a merging of older concepts such as kinetic-Wulff constructions with methods to understand minimum energy shapes for particles with twins. Overall we find that while there are still many unknowns, the broad framework of understanding and predicting the structure of nanoparticles via diverse Wulff constructions, either thermodynamic, local minima or kinetic has been exceedingly successful. However, the field is still developing and there remain many unknowns and new avenues for research, a few of these being suggested towards the end of the review.
AB - Nanoparticles can be beautiful, as in stained glass windows, or they can be ugly as in wear and corrosion debris from implants. We estimate that there will be about 70 000 papers in 2015 with nanoparticles as a keyword, but only one in thirteen uses the nanoparticle shape as an additional keyword and research focus, and only one in two hundred has thermodynamics. Methods for synthesizing nanoparticles have exploded over the last decade, but our understanding of how and why they take their forms has not progressed as fast. This topical review attempts to take a critical snapshot of the current understanding, focusing more on methods to predict than a purely synthetic or descriptive approach. We look at models and themes which are largely independent of the exact synthetic method whether it is deposition, gas-phase condensation, solution based or hydrothermal synthesis. Elements are old dating back to the beginning of the 20th century - some of the pioneering models developed then are still relevant today. Others are newer, a merging of older concepts such as kinetic-Wulff constructions with methods to understand minimum energy shapes for particles with twins. Overall we find that while there are still many unknowns, the broad framework of understanding and predicting the structure of nanoparticles via diverse Wulff constructions, either thermodynamic, local minima or kinetic has been exceedingly successful. However, the field is still developing and there remain many unknowns and new avenues for research, a few of these being suggested towards the end of the review.
KW - electron microscopy
KW - kinetics
KW - nanoparticles
KW - shape
KW - thermodynamics
KW - wulff construction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955453497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955453497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0953-8984/28/5/053001
DO - 10.1088/0953-8984/28/5/053001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26792459
AN - SCOPUS:84955453497
VL - 28
JO - Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
JF - Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
SN - 0953-8984
IS - 5
M1 - 053001
ER -