National assessment of margin status as a quality indicator after pancreatic cancer surgery

Ryan P. Merkow*, Karl Y. Bilimoria, David J. Bentrem, Henry A. Pitt, David P. Winchester, Mitchell C. Posner, Clifford Y. Ko, Timothy M. Pawlik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Surgical margin involvement is an important outcome after pancreatic cancer surgery; however, variation in pathologic review practices may limit its use as a quality indicator. Our objectives were to assess variation in hospital performance and the reliability of margin involvement after pancreatic cancer surgery. Methods. From the National Cancer Data Base, patients who underwent pancreatic resection for stage I to III adenocarcinoma were identified. Risk-adjusted surgical margin involvement was evaluated using hierarchical regression methods, and variation in hospital performance and reliability was determined. Results. From 1,002 hospitals, 14,889 patients underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma, and 3,573 (24.0 %) had an involved surgical margin (R1 22.8 %; R2 1.2 %). The strongest predictors associated with margin involvement were T stage [T3: odds ratio (OR) 2.08, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.68-2.59; T4: OR 7.26, 95 % CI 5.50-9.60; vs. T1] and tumor size (2-3.9 cm: OR 1.66, 95 % CI 1.39-1.98, ≥4 cm: OR 2.28, 95 % CI 1.90-2.74; vs. <2 cm). Factors associated with a decreased likelihood of margin involvement were the use of neoadjuvant therapy and hospital type (academic and National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers vs. community). At the hospital level, the mean risk-adjusted surgical margin involvement rate was 25.9 % and ranged 10.1 to 50.5 %. Twenty-one (2.1 %) hospitals had lower-than-expected and 17 (1.7 %) had higher-than-expected margin involvement. A minimum acceptable reliability of 0.4 was met after 13 cases and was achieved by 249 hospitals that performed 79 % of pancreatic resections assessed. Conclusions. Despite differences in pathologic evaluation practices, hospitals can be feasibly and reliably provided comparative data on surgical margin status after resection for pancreatic cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1067-1074
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of surgical oncology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'National assessment of margin status as a quality indicator after pancreatic cancer surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this