National survey of ovarian carcinoma: I. A patient care evaluation study of the American College of Surgeons

H. E. Averette*, W. Hoskins, H. N. Nguyen, G. Boike, H. C. Flessa, J. S. Chmiel, K. Zuber, L. H. Karnell, D. P. Winchester

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

97 Scopus citations


Background. The Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons recently finished a national survey of patients with ovarian cancer patients. The goal was to compare the patterns of care over a 5-year period. Methods. Data were collected from 25 consecutive patients whose disease was diagnosed first at 904 hospitals with cancer programs in 1983 and 1988. Results. There was a total of 12,316 patients, of whom 80% were 45-85 years old. Contrary to popular belief, only 8.2% of patients were nulliparous; 85% of patients had one to five children. Of significance, 18.2% of patients with ovarian cancer had undergone a previous hysterectomy with ovarian preservation. Primary surgical treatment was used in 94.9% of patients and consisted of: oophorectomy, 81.9%; hysterectomy, 55.1%; and omentectomy, 59.0%. However, only 12-25% of patients had biopsies of the diaphragm, paracolic gutters, colon, small bowel, pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes, and cul-de-sac to permit adequate surgical staging. The primary surgeons were: gynecologic oncologists, 21%; obstetrician-gynecologists, 45%; general surgeons, 21%; and others, 13%. Conclusions. These data indicate that additional resources are needed to improve the care of patients with ovarian cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1629-1638
Number of pages10
Issue number4 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1993


  • national survey
  • ovarian carcinoma
  • patient care evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research


Dive into the research topics of 'National survey of ovarian carcinoma: I. A patient care evaluation study of the American College of Surgeons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this