Nature or nurture? Judicial lawmaking in the european court of justice and the Andean Tribunal of justice

Karen J. Alter, Laurence R. Helfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Are international courts power-seeking by nature, expanding the reach and scope of international rules and the courts' authority where permissive conditions allow? Or, does expansionist lawmaking require special nurturing? We investigate the relative influences of nature versus nurture by comparing expansionist lawmaking in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ), the ECJ's jurisdictional cousin and the third most active international court. We argue that international judges are more likely to become expansionist lawmakers where they are supported by substate interlocutors and compliance constituencies, including government officials, advocacy networks, national judges, and administrative agencies. This comparison of two structurally identical international courts calls into question prevailing explanations of ECJ lawmaking, and it suggests that prevailing scholarship puts too much emphasis on the self-interested power-seeking of judges, the importance of institutional design features, and the preferences of governments to explain lawmaking by international courts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563-592
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Organization
Volume64
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

European Court of Justice
justice
nature-nurture
Nature
Justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Law

Cite this

@article{62fb8328a792443e9b28d2477c0f6ee6,
title = "Nature or nurture? Judicial lawmaking in the european court of justice and the Andean Tribunal of justice",
abstract = "Are international courts power-seeking by nature, expanding the reach and scope of international rules and the courts' authority where permissive conditions allow? Or, does expansionist lawmaking require special nurturing? We investigate the relative influences of nature versus nurture by comparing expansionist lawmaking in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ), the ECJ's jurisdictional cousin and the third most active international court. We argue that international judges are more likely to become expansionist lawmakers where they are supported by substate interlocutors and compliance constituencies, including government officials, advocacy networks, national judges, and administrative agencies. This comparison of two structurally identical international courts calls into question prevailing explanations of ECJ lawmaking, and it suggests that prevailing scholarship puts too much emphasis on the self-interested power-seeking of judges, the importance of institutional design features, and the preferences of governments to explain lawmaking by international courts.",
author = "Alter, {Karen J.} and Helfer, {Laurence R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0020818310000238",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "563--592",
journal = "International Organization",
issn = "0020-8183",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Nature or nurture? Judicial lawmaking in the european court of justice and the Andean Tribunal of justice. / Alter, Karen J.; Helfer, Laurence R.

In: International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 4, 01.09.2010, p. 563-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nature or nurture? Judicial lawmaking in the european court of justice and the Andean Tribunal of justice

AU - Alter, Karen J.

AU - Helfer, Laurence R.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Are international courts power-seeking by nature, expanding the reach and scope of international rules and the courts' authority where permissive conditions allow? Or, does expansionist lawmaking require special nurturing? We investigate the relative influences of nature versus nurture by comparing expansionist lawmaking in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ), the ECJ's jurisdictional cousin and the third most active international court. We argue that international judges are more likely to become expansionist lawmakers where they are supported by substate interlocutors and compliance constituencies, including government officials, advocacy networks, national judges, and administrative agencies. This comparison of two structurally identical international courts calls into question prevailing explanations of ECJ lawmaking, and it suggests that prevailing scholarship puts too much emphasis on the self-interested power-seeking of judges, the importance of institutional design features, and the preferences of governments to explain lawmaking by international courts.

AB - Are international courts power-seeking by nature, expanding the reach and scope of international rules and the courts' authority where permissive conditions allow? Or, does expansionist lawmaking require special nurturing? We investigate the relative influences of nature versus nurture by comparing expansionist lawmaking in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ), the ECJ's jurisdictional cousin and the third most active international court. We argue that international judges are more likely to become expansionist lawmakers where they are supported by substate interlocutors and compliance constituencies, including government officials, advocacy networks, national judges, and administrative agencies. This comparison of two structurally identical international courts calls into question prevailing explanations of ECJ lawmaking, and it suggests that prevailing scholarship puts too much emphasis on the self-interested power-seeking of judges, the importance of institutional design features, and the preferences of governments to explain lawmaking by international courts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952983030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952983030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0020818310000238

DO - 10.1017/S0020818310000238

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952983030

VL - 64

SP - 563

EP - 592

JO - International Organization

JF - International Organization

SN - 0020-8183

IS - 4

ER -