Navigators and captains: Expertise in clinical ethics consultation

Laurie Zoloth-Dorfman*, Susan B. Rubin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The debate about what constitutes the discipline of ethics and who qualifies as an ethics consultant is linked unavoidably to a debate that is potentiated by the reality of a rapidly changing and high-stakes health care consultation marketplace. Who we are and what we can offer to the moral gesture that is medicine is shaped by our fundamental understanding of the place of expert knowledge in the transformation of social reality. The struggle for self-definition is particularly freighted since clinical ethics consultation aspires to be more than academic contemplation. Two recent books (Ethics Consultation by John La Puma and David Schiedermayer and The Health Care Ethics Consultant: A Practical Guide, edited by Francoise Baylis) exemplify the two most popular but most widely divergent positions on these issues. We argue that while useful, neither book addresses fully the particular and distinct role of the professional ethicist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-432
Number of pages12
JournalTheoretical Medicine
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 5 1997

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Bioethics committees
  • Bioethics education
  • Case review
  • Clinical ethics consultation
  • Ethicists
  • Expertise
  • Mediation
  • Professional ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Navigators and captains: Expertise in clinical ethics consultation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this