TY - JOUR
T1 - Needs assessment for an errors-based curriculum on thoracoscopic lobectomy
AU - Meyerson, Shari Lynn
AU - Tong, Betty C.
AU - Balderson, Stafford S.
AU - D'Amico, Thomas A.
AU - Phillips, Joseph D.
AU - DeCamp Jr, Malcom McAvoy
AU - DaRosa, Debra
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by a Simulation in Thoracic Surgery Education Grant from Thoracic Surgery Foundation for Research and Education . We acknowledge the donations of equipment from Covidien (staplers and staple loads), Scanlan (surgical instruments), and Karl Storz (video equipment) that facilitated the performance of this study.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Background: Research suggests a benefit from a skills curriculum emphasizing error prevention, identification, and management. Our purpose was to identify common errors committed by trainees during simulated thoracoscopic lobectomy for use in developing an error-based curriculum. Methods: Twenty-one residents (postgraduate years 1 to 8) performed a thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy on a previously validated simulator. Videos of the procedure were reviewed in a blinded fashion using a checklist listing 66 possible cognitive and technical errors. Results: Of the 21 residents, 15 (71%) self-reported completing the anatomic lobectomy; however, only 7 (33%) had actually divided all of the necessary structures correctly. While dissecting the superior pulmonary vein, 16 residents (76%) made at least one error. The most common (n = 13, 62%) was dissecting individual branches rather than the entire vein. On the bronchus, 14 (67%) made at least one error. Again, the most common (n = 9, 43%) was dissecting branches. During these tasks, cognitive errors were more common than technical errors. While dissecting arterial branches, 18 residents (86%) made at least one error. Technical and cognitive errors occurred with equal frequency during arterial dissection. The most common arterial error was excess tension on the vessel (n = 10, 48%). Conclusions: Curriculum developers should identify skill-specific technical and judgment errors to verify the scope of errors typically committed. For a thoracoscopic lobectomy curriculum, emphasis should be placed on correct identification of anatomic landmarks during dissection of the vein and airway and on proper tissue handling technique during arterial dissection.
AB - Background: Research suggests a benefit from a skills curriculum emphasizing error prevention, identification, and management. Our purpose was to identify common errors committed by trainees during simulated thoracoscopic lobectomy for use in developing an error-based curriculum. Methods: Twenty-one residents (postgraduate years 1 to 8) performed a thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy on a previously validated simulator. Videos of the procedure were reviewed in a blinded fashion using a checklist listing 66 possible cognitive and technical errors. Results: Of the 21 residents, 15 (71%) self-reported completing the anatomic lobectomy; however, only 7 (33%) had actually divided all of the necessary structures correctly. While dissecting the superior pulmonary vein, 16 residents (76%) made at least one error. The most common (n = 13, 62%) was dissecting individual branches rather than the entire vein. On the bronchus, 14 (67%) made at least one error. Again, the most common (n = 9, 43%) was dissecting branches. During these tasks, cognitive errors were more common than technical errors. While dissecting arterial branches, 18 residents (86%) made at least one error. Technical and cognitive errors occurred with equal frequency during arterial dissection. The most common arterial error was excess tension on the vessel (n = 10, 48%). Conclusions: Curriculum developers should identify skill-specific technical and judgment errors to verify the scope of errors typically committed. For a thoracoscopic lobectomy curriculum, emphasis should be placed on correct identification of anatomic landmarks during dissection of the vein and airway and on proper tissue handling technique during arterial dissection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864226671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864226671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.023
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 22633499
AN - SCOPUS:84864226671
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 94
SP - 368
EP - 373
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 2
ER -