TY - JOUR
T1 - Negative aspects of close relationships are more strongly associated than supportive personal relationships with illness burden of irritable bowel syndrome
AU - Lackner, Jeffrey M.
AU - Gudleski, Gregory D.
AU - Firth, Rebecca
AU - Keefer, Laurie
AU - Brenner, Darren M.
AU - Guy, Katie
AU - Simonetti, Camille
AU - Radziwon, Christopher
AU - Quinton, Sarah
AU - Krasner, Susan S.
AU - Katz, Leonard
AU - Garbarino, Guido
AU - Iacobucci, Gary D.
AU - Sitrin, Michael D.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Objective: This study assessed the relative magnitude of associations between IBS outcomes and different aspects of social relationships (social support, negative interactions). Method: Subjects included 235 Rome III diagnosed IBS patients (M age = 41. yrs, F = 78%) without comorbid GI disease. Subjects completed a testing battery that included the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (Social Support or SS), Negative Interaction (NI) Scale, IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), IBS-QOL, BSI Depression, STAI Trait Anxiety, SOMS-7 (somatization), Perceived Stress Scale, and a medical comorbidity checklist. Results: After controlling for demographic variables, both SS and NI were significantly correlated with all of the clinical variables (SS r's = 20 to 36; NI r's = 17 to 53, respectively; ps. < .05) save for IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS). NI, but not SS, was positively correlated with IBS-SSS. After performing r-to-z transformations on the correlation coefficients and then comparing z-scores, the correlation between perceived stress, and NI was significantly stronger than with SS. There was no significant difference between the strength of correlations between NI and SS for depression, somatization, trait anxiety, and IBSQOL. A hierarchical linear regression identified both SS and NI as significant predictors of IBS-QOL. Conclusions: Different aspects of social relationships - support and negative interactions - are associated with multiple aspects of IBS experience (e.g. stress, QOL impairment). Negative social relationships marked by conflict and adverse exchanges are more consistently and strongly related to IBS outcomes than social support.
AB - Objective: This study assessed the relative magnitude of associations between IBS outcomes and different aspects of social relationships (social support, negative interactions). Method: Subjects included 235 Rome III diagnosed IBS patients (M age = 41. yrs, F = 78%) without comorbid GI disease. Subjects completed a testing battery that included the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (Social Support or SS), Negative Interaction (NI) Scale, IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), IBS-QOL, BSI Depression, STAI Trait Anxiety, SOMS-7 (somatization), Perceived Stress Scale, and a medical comorbidity checklist. Results: After controlling for demographic variables, both SS and NI were significantly correlated with all of the clinical variables (SS r's = 20 to 36; NI r's = 17 to 53, respectively; ps. < .05) save for IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS). NI, but not SS, was positively correlated with IBS-SSS. After performing r-to-z transformations on the correlation coefficients and then comparing z-scores, the correlation between perceived stress, and NI was significantly stronger than with SS. There was no significant difference between the strength of correlations between NI and SS for depression, somatization, trait anxiety, and IBSQOL. A hierarchical linear regression identified both SS and NI as significant predictors of IBS-QOL. Conclusions: Different aspects of social relationships - support and negative interactions - are associated with multiple aspects of IBS experience (e.g. stress, QOL impairment). Negative social relationships marked by conflict and adverse exchanges are more consistently and strongly related to IBS outcomes than social support.
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Coping
KW - Health
KW - Interpersonal interactions
KW - Pain
KW - Social networks
KW - Social support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878601969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878601969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 23731746
AN - SCOPUS:84878601969
SN - 0022-3999
VL - 74
SP - 493
EP - 500
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
IS - 6
ER -