Negative Outcome in Psychotherapy: A Critical Review

David C. Mohr*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

232 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reviews literature on negative outcome in psychotherapy for adult, non‐psychotic individuals. Patient, therapist, and therapy variables are examined, and tentative conclusions are drawn from the existing data. Patients who are borderline or obsessive‐compulsive, have severe interpersonal difficulties, are poorly motivated, or who expect psychotherapy to be painless have been found to be at risk for deterioration. On the part of the therapist, lack of empathy, underestimation of the severity of the patient's problems, negative counter transference, poor technique, high concentrations of transference interpretations, and disagreement with the patient about the therapy process all have been associated with negative outcome. Cestalt therapies have produced higher rates of deterioration than other psychotherapy modalities. Issues in research methodology are discussed, including identification of negative responders, outcome measurement, identification of variables related to negative outcome, and the role that ethical dilemmas play in research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalClinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1995

Keywords

  • negative outcome
  • negative responders
  • outcome measurement
  • psychotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Negative Outcome in Psychotherapy: A Critical Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this