Abstract
Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), HER2 (ERBB2) gene amplification is implicated in anti-EGFR therapy resistance. We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and efficacy of neratinib, a pan-ERBB kinase inhibitor, combined with cetuximab, in patients with progressive disease (PD) on anti-EGFR treatment. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one patients with quadruple-wild-type, refractory mCRC enrolled in this 3þ3 phase Ib study. Standard dosage cetuximab was administered with neratinib at 120 mg, 160 mg, 200 mg, and 240 mg/day orally in 28-day cycles. Samples were collected for molecular and pharmacokinetic studies. Results: Sixteen patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). 240 mg was determined to be the RP2D wherein a single DLT occurred (1/7 patients). Treatment-related DLTs were not seen at lower doses. Best response was stable disease (SD) in 7 of 16 (44%) patients. HER2 amplification (chromogenic in situ IHC) was detected in 2 of 21 (9.5%) treatment-naïve tumors and 4 of 16 (25%) biopsies upon trial enrollment (post-anti-EGFR treatment and progression). Compared with matched enrollment biopsies, 6 of 8 (75%) blood samples showed concordance for HER2 CNV in circulating cell-free DNA. Five SD patients had HER2 amplification in either treatment-naïve or enrollment biopsies. Examination of gene-expression, total protein, and protein phosphorylation levels showed relative upregulation of ≥2 members of the HER-family receptors or ligands upon enrollment versus matched treatment-naïve samples. Conclusions: The RP2D of neratinib in this combination was 240 mg/day, which was well tolerated with low incidence of G3 AEs. There were no objective responses; SD was seen at all neratinib doses. HER2 amplification, detectable in both tissue and blood, was more frequent post-anti-EGFR therapy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1612-1622 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Clinical Cancer Research |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2021 |
Funding
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Christine I. Rudock, Publications and Graphics Specialist and Wendy L. Rea, BA, Editorial Associate, both of whom are employees of NSABP. They were not compensated beyond their normal salaries for this work. This work was supported by Puma Biotechnology, Inc. This project used the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Cancer Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Facility (CPPF), and was supported, in part, by awards NCI P30 CA047904 and R50 CA211241; and NSABP Foundation, Inc.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine