TY - JOUR
T1 - Networks and Economic Fragility
AU - Elliott, Matthew
AU - Golub, Benjamin
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Yixi Jiang, Konstantinos Leledakis, and Gabriel Hannon for excellent research assistance, and Hossein Alidaee for very helpful comments on an earlier draft. We are grateful to Stephen Morris for helpful guidance as we revised the manuscript for publication. This project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant 757229) and the JM Keynes Fellowships Fund (to M.E.) and from the National Science Foundation (grant SES-1629446) (to B.G.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Annual Reviews Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Many firms, banks, or other economic agents embedded in a network of codependencies may experience a contemporaneous, sharp drop in functionality or productivity following a shockeven if that shock is localized or moderate in magnitude. We offer an extended review of motivating evidence that such fragility is a live concern in supply networks and in financial systems. We then discuss network models of fragility, focusing on the forces that make aggregate functionality especially sensitive to the economic environment. The key structural features of networks that determine their fragility are reviewed, with an emphasis on the importance of phase transitions. We then turn to endogenous decisions, both by market participants (e.g., firms investing in network formation and robustness) and by planners (e.g., authorities undertaking macroprudential regulation). Fragility has some distinctive implications for such decisions.
AB - Many firms, banks, or other economic agents embedded in a network of codependencies may experience a contemporaneous, sharp drop in functionality or productivity following a shockeven if that shock is localized or moderate in magnitude. We offer an extended review of motivating evidence that such fragility is a live concern in supply networks and in financial systems. We then discuss network models of fragility, focusing on the forces that make aggregate functionality especially sensitive to the economic environment. The key structural features of networks that determine their fragility are reviewed, with an emphasis on the importance of phase transitions. We then turn to endogenous decisions, both by market participants (e.g., firms investing in network formation and robustness) and by planners (e.g., authorities undertaking macroprudential regulation). Fragility has some distinctive implications for such decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130008516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130008516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-021647
DO - 10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-021647
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85130008516
SN - 1941-1383
VL - 14
SP - 665
EP - 696
JO - Annual Review of Economics
JF - Annual Review of Economics
ER -