Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing

The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses

Sladjana Lukic*, Aya Meltzer-Asscher, James Higgins, Todd B Parrish, Cynthia K Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Word-class ambiguous words engender greater processing time and fMRI (BOLD signal) activation than unambiguous ones. Theoretical accounts of this phenomenon suggest that words with multiple meanings (1) are associated with multiple lexical entries and thus require greater selection demands, or (2) undergo computationally expensive grammatical processes that convert words from one word-class to another. Using an fMRI grammaticality judgment task, we tested these accounts by examining word-class ambiguous polysemic (e.g., brush) and homonymic (e.g., bear) verbs, and unambiguous verbs (e.g., bake). Results showed that ambiguous verbs evoked longer response times and greater neural activation in the left inferior frontal and parietal gyri. However, homonymic verbs also showed increased left inferior frontal and temporal neural activations compared to polysemic verbs. This indicates that rather than having multiple lexical representations like homonyms, polysemic verbs may share a core representation with their noun counterparts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-76
Number of pages12
JournalBrain and Language
Volume194
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

activation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prefrontal Cortex
Reaction Time
Verbs
Lexical Entries
Verb Processing
time
Activation
Word Class
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Categorical ambiguity
  • Conversion/zero-morphology
  • Semantic control
  • Word-class
  • fMRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{e23743d9b6254b66b2796741b07b0e15,
title = "Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing: The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses",
abstract = "Word-class ambiguous words engender greater processing time and fMRI (BOLD signal) activation than unambiguous ones. Theoretical accounts of this phenomenon suggest that words with multiple meanings (1) are associated with multiple lexical entries and thus require greater selection demands, or (2) undergo computationally expensive grammatical processes that convert words from one word-class to another. Using an fMRI grammaticality judgment task, we tested these accounts by examining word-class ambiguous polysemic (e.g., brush) and homonymic (e.g., bear) verbs, and unambiguous verbs (e.g., bake). Results showed that ambiguous verbs evoked longer response times and greater neural activation in the left inferior frontal and parietal gyri. However, homonymic verbs also showed increased left inferior frontal and temporal neural activations compared to polysemic verbs. This indicates that rather than having multiple lexical representations like homonyms, polysemic verbs may share a core representation with their noun counterparts.",
keywords = "Categorical ambiguity, Conversion/zero-morphology, Semantic control, Word-class, fMRI",
author = "Sladjana Lukic and Aya Meltzer-Asscher and James Higgins and Parrish, {Todd B} and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "194",
pages = "65--76",
journal = "Brain and Language",
issn = "0093-934X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing : The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses. / Lukic, Sladjana; Meltzer-Asscher, Aya; Higgins, James; Parrish, Todd B; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Brain and Language, Vol. 194, 01.07.2019, p. 65-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing

T2 - The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses

AU - Lukic, Sladjana

AU - Meltzer-Asscher, Aya

AU - Higgins, James

AU - Parrish, Todd B

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Word-class ambiguous words engender greater processing time and fMRI (BOLD signal) activation than unambiguous ones. Theoretical accounts of this phenomenon suggest that words with multiple meanings (1) are associated with multiple lexical entries and thus require greater selection demands, or (2) undergo computationally expensive grammatical processes that convert words from one word-class to another. Using an fMRI grammaticality judgment task, we tested these accounts by examining word-class ambiguous polysemic (e.g., brush) and homonymic (e.g., bear) verbs, and unambiguous verbs (e.g., bake). Results showed that ambiguous verbs evoked longer response times and greater neural activation in the left inferior frontal and parietal gyri. However, homonymic verbs also showed increased left inferior frontal and temporal neural activations compared to polysemic verbs. This indicates that rather than having multiple lexical representations like homonyms, polysemic verbs may share a core representation with their noun counterparts.

AB - Word-class ambiguous words engender greater processing time and fMRI (BOLD signal) activation than unambiguous ones. Theoretical accounts of this phenomenon suggest that words with multiple meanings (1) are associated with multiple lexical entries and thus require greater selection demands, or (2) undergo computationally expensive grammatical processes that convert words from one word-class to another. Using an fMRI grammaticality judgment task, we tested these accounts by examining word-class ambiguous polysemic (e.g., brush) and homonymic (e.g., bear) verbs, and unambiguous verbs (e.g., bake). Results showed that ambiguous verbs evoked longer response times and greater neural activation in the left inferior frontal and parietal gyri. However, homonymic verbs also showed increased left inferior frontal and temporal neural activations compared to polysemic verbs. This indicates that rather than having multiple lexical representations like homonyms, polysemic verbs may share a core representation with their noun counterparts.

KW - Categorical ambiguity

KW - Conversion/zero-morphology

KW - Semantic control

KW - Word-class

KW - fMRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065608455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065608455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 194

SP - 65

EP - 76

JO - Brain and Language

JF - Brain and Language

SN - 0093-934X

ER -