TY - JOUR
T1 - Nipple discharge
T2 - Current clinical and imaging evaluation
AU - Gupta, Dipti
AU - Mendelson, Ellen B.
AU - Karst, Ingolf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Roentgen Ray Society
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - OBJECTIVE. Nipple discharge is a common complaint that is first evaluated with clinical assessment. Physiologic discharge does not require imaging other than routine screening mammography. Initial evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge involves mammography and ultrasound. evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge involves mammography and ultrasound. Because of its high sensitivity in detecting breast malignancy and its biopsy capability, MRI is increasingly used in lieu of ductography. CONCLUSION. The problem-solving algorithm for evaluating suspicious nipple discharge is evolving. When diagnostic imaging for evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge is negative, management is based on clinical suspicion. If additional imaging is warranted, MRI is preferred because of its increased sensitivity, specificity, and patient comfort. Although central duct excision is the current standard for evaluation of malignancy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge, studies suggest that, given the high negative predictive value of MRI, surveillance may be a reasonable alternative to surgery.
AB - OBJECTIVE. Nipple discharge is a common complaint that is first evaluated with clinical assessment. Physiologic discharge does not require imaging other than routine screening mammography. Initial evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge involves mammography and ultrasound. evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge involves mammography and ultrasound. Because of its high sensitivity in detecting breast malignancy and its biopsy capability, MRI is increasingly used in lieu of ductography. CONCLUSION. The problem-solving algorithm for evaluating suspicious nipple discharge is evolving. When diagnostic imaging for evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge is negative, management is based on clinical suspicion. If additional imaging is warranted, MRI is preferred because of its increased sensitivity, specificity, and patient comfort. Although central duct excision is the current standard for evaluation of malignancy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge, studies suggest that, given the high negative predictive value of MRI, surveillance may be a reasonable alternative to surgery.
KW - Central duct excision
KW - Ductography
KW - Nipple discharge
KW - Pathologic discharge
KW - Physiologic discharge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100280645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100280645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.19.22025
DO - 10.2214/AJR.19.22025
M3 - Article
C2 - 33295815
AN - SCOPUS:85100280645
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 216
SP - 330
EP - 339
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 2
ER -