TY - JOUR
T1 - No S.C.A.R.E. Protocol
T2 - A Streamlined Safety Protocol
AU - Jenkins, Tyler James
AU - Snowden, Ryan D.
AU - Smucker, Joseph
AU - Hsu, Wellington K.
AU - Riew, K. Dan
AU - Sasso, Rick C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Introduction: Despite the proven success of anterior cervical surgery (ACS) postoperative issues can arise, with retropharyngeal hematoma (RH) being one of the most feared. A recent USA Today article highlighted the failed management and subsequent death of patients developing RH after ACS. The article calls into question the safety of performing ACS in an outpatient setting. Methods: We tested the knowledge of 20 healthcare professionals (4 surgeons, 16 ancillary providers) regarding ways to minimize the post-ACS complications. We used a multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank test. We then developed a No S.C.A.R.E. safety protocol and after teaching the same professionals, re-administered the examination to assess improvement. Results: We identified large gaps in knowledge between spine surgeons and other providers (92.3% versus 31.2%) on preintervention testing. Postintervention testing showed significant improvement in nonsurgeon scores (31.2% to 86.1%, P <0.01). Improvement was also seen in provider confidence after completion of the education module. Conclusion: Previous studies demonstrate that the incidence of RH necessitating evacuation after ACS is extremely small (1 <1%). For rare complications, healthcare teams may benefit from educational modules and standardized protocols. After implementation of our No S.C.A.R.E. protocol, provider knowledge and confidence markedly improved. We recommend similar education modules and protocols be used at other institutions performing ACS.
AB - Introduction: Despite the proven success of anterior cervical surgery (ACS) postoperative issues can arise, with retropharyngeal hematoma (RH) being one of the most feared. A recent USA Today article highlighted the failed management and subsequent death of patients developing RH after ACS. The article calls into question the safety of performing ACS in an outpatient setting. Methods: We tested the knowledge of 20 healthcare professionals (4 surgeons, 16 ancillary providers) regarding ways to minimize the post-ACS complications. We used a multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank test. We then developed a No S.C.A.R.E. safety protocol and after teaching the same professionals, re-administered the examination to assess improvement. Results: We identified large gaps in knowledge between spine surgeons and other providers (92.3% versus 31.2%) on preintervention testing. Postintervention testing showed significant improvement in nonsurgeon scores (31.2% to 86.1%, P <0.01). Improvement was also seen in provider confidence after completion of the education module. Conclusion: Previous studies demonstrate that the incidence of RH necessitating evacuation after ACS is extremely small (1 <1%). For rare complications, healthcare teams may benefit from educational modules and standardized protocols. After implementation of our No S.C.A.R.E. protocol, provider knowledge and confidence markedly improved. We recommend similar education modules and protocols be used at other institutions performing ACS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077107906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077107906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00698
DO - 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00698
M3 - Article
C2 - 31090553
AN - SCOPUS:85077107906
VL - 28
SP - 21
EP - 28
JO - The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
SN - 1067-151X
IS - 1
ER -