TY - JOUR
T1 - Normal Values of Left Ventricular Mass by Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
T2 - Results from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography Normal Values Study
AU - WASE Study Investigators
AU - Lee, Linda
AU - Cotella, Juan I.
AU - Miyoshi, Tatsuya
AU - Addetia, Karima
AU - Schreckenberg, Marcus
AU - Hitschrich, Niklas
AU - Blankenhagen, Michael
AU - Amuthan, Vivekanandan
AU - Citro, Rodolfo
AU - Daimon, Masao
AU - Gutiérrez-Fajardo, Pedro
AU - Kasliwal, Ravi
AU - Kirkpatrick, James N.
AU - Monaghan, Mark J.
AU - Muraru, Denisa
AU - Ogunyankin, Kofo O.
AU - Park, Seung Woo
AU - Tude Rodrigues, Ana Clara
AU - Ronderos, Ricardo
AU - Sadeghpour, Anita
AU - Scalia, Gregory M.
AU - Takeuchi, Masaaki
AU - Tsang, Wendy
AU - Tucay, Edwin S.
AU - Zhang, Mei
AU - Mor-Avi, Victor
AU - Asch, Federico M.
AU - Lang, Roberto M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society of Echocardiography
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: Although increased left ventricular (LV) mass is associated with adverse outcomes, measured values vary widely depending on the specific technique used. Moreover, the impact of sex, age, and race on LV mass remains controversial, further limiting the clinical use of this parameter. Accordingly, the authors studied LV mass using a variety of two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiographic techniques in a large population of normal subjects encompassing a wide range of ages. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained from 1,854 healthy adult subjects (52% men) enrolled in the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) Normal Values Study, were divided into three age groups (young, 18-35 years; middle aged, 36-55 years; and old, >55 years). LV mass was obtained using five conventional techniques, including linear and two-dimensional methods, as well as direct three-dimensional measurement. All LV mass values were indexed to body surface area, and differences according to sex, age, and race were analyzed for each technique. Results: LV mass values differed significantly among the five techniques. Three-dimensional measurements were considerably smaller than those obtained using the other techniques and were closer to magnetic resonance imaging normal values reported in the literature. For all techniques, LV mass in men was significantly larger than in women, with and without body surface area indexing. These technique- and sex-related differences were larger than measurement variability. In women, age differences in LV mass were more pronounced and depicted significantly larger values in older age groups for all techniques, except three-dimensional echocardiography, which showed essentially no differences. LV mass was overall larger in black subjects than in white or Asian subjects. Conclusions: Significant differences in LV mass values exist across echocardiographic techniques, which are therefore not interchangeable. Sex-, race-, and age-related differences underscore the need for separate population specific normal values.
AB - Background: Although increased left ventricular (LV) mass is associated with adverse outcomes, measured values vary widely depending on the specific technique used. Moreover, the impact of sex, age, and race on LV mass remains controversial, further limiting the clinical use of this parameter. Accordingly, the authors studied LV mass using a variety of two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiographic techniques in a large population of normal subjects encompassing a wide range of ages. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained from 1,854 healthy adult subjects (52% men) enrolled in the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) Normal Values Study, were divided into three age groups (young, 18-35 years; middle aged, 36-55 years; and old, >55 years). LV mass was obtained using five conventional techniques, including linear and two-dimensional methods, as well as direct three-dimensional measurement. All LV mass values were indexed to body surface area, and differences according to sex, age, and race were analyzed for each technique. Results: LV mass values differed significantly among the five techniques. Three-dimensional measurements were considerably smaller than those obtained using the other techniques and were closer to magnetic resonance imaging normal values reported in the literature. For all techniques, LV mass in men was significantly larger than in women, with and without body surface area indexing. These technique- and sex-related differences were larger than measurement variability. In women, age differences in LV mass were more pronounced and depicted significantly larger values in older age groups for all techniques, except three-dimensional echocardiography, which showed essentially no differences. LV mass was overall larger in black subjects than in white or Asian subjects. Conclusions: Significant differences in LV mass values exist across echocardiographic techniques, which are therefore not interchangeable. Sex-, race-, and age-related differences underscore the need for separate population specific normal values.
KW - 2D echocardiography
KW - 3D echocardiography
KW - Left ventricular hypertrophy
KW - Reference values
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147279016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147279016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2022.12.016
DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2022.12.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 36584904
AN - SCOPUS:85147279016
SN - 0894-7317
VL - 36
SP - 533-542.e1
JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
IS - 5
ER -