Abstract
Background & Aims: There is significant variability in the immediate post-operative and long-term management of patients undergoing per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), largely stemming from the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to establish a consensus on several important questions on the after care of post-POEM patients through a modified Delphi process. Methods: A steering committee developed an initial questionnaire consisting of 5 domains (33 statements): post-POEM admission/discharge, indication for immediate post-POEM esophagram, peri-procedural medications and diet resumption, clinic follow-up recommendations, and post-POEM reflux surveillance and management. A total of 34 experts participated in the 2 rounds of the Delphi process, with quantitative and qualitative data analyzed for each round to achieve consensus. Results: A total of 23 statements achieved a high degree of consensus. Overall, the expert panel agreed on the following: (1) same-day discharge after POEM can be considered in select patients; (2) a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics may be as effective as a short course; (3) a modified diet can be advanced as tolerated; and (4) all patients should be followed in clinic and undergo objective testing for surveillance and management of reflux. Consensus could not be achieved on the indication of post-POEM esophagram to evaluate for leak. Conclusions: The results of this Delphi process established expert agreement on several important issues and provides practical guidance on key aspects in the care of patients following POEM.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
Funding
Dennis Yang, MD (Conceptualization: Lead; Data curation: Lead; Formal analysis: Lead; Methodology: Lead; Project administration: Lead; Writing \u2013 original draft: Lead), Abdul Mohammed (Data curation: Supporting; Formal analysis: Supporting; Project administration: Supporting), Rena Yadlapati (Conceptualization: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting), Andrew Y. Wang (Conceptualization: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting), Thurarshen Jeyalingam (Conceptualization: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting), Peter V. Draganov (Conceptualization: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting), Ernesto Robalino Gonzaga (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Muhammad K. Hasan (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Alexander Schlachterman (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Ming-Ming Xu (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Ahmed Saeed (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Aziz Aadam (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Reem Z. Sharaiha (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Ryan Law (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Louis M. Wong Kee Song (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Monica Saumoy (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), John E. Pandolfino (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Makoto Nishimura (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Michel Kahaleh (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Joo Ha Hwang (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Robert Bechara (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Vani JA Konda (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), John M. DeWitt (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Prashant Kedia (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Nikhil A. Kumta (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Irteza Inayat (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Stavros N. Stavropoulos (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Vivek Kumbhari (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Uzma D. Siddiqui (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Salmaan Jawaid (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Sherif Andrawes (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Mouen Khashab (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Joseph R. Triggs (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Neil Sharma (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Mohamed Othman (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Amritha Sethi (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Alexandra J. Baumann (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Cyrus Priraka (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Christy M. Dunst (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Mihir S. Wagh (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Mohammad Al-Haddad (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Prakash Gyawali (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), Sergey Kantsevoy (Resources: Supporting; Writing \u2013 review & editing: Supporting), B. Joseph Elmunzer (Conceptualization: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting)
Keywords
- Delphi Process
- POEM
- Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hepatology
- Gastroenterology