“Not One of Us”: Predictors and Consequences of Denying Ingroup Characteristics to Ambiguous Targets

Nour Kteily*, Sarah Cotterill, Jim Sidanius, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Robin Bergh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

We investigated individual difference predictors of ascribing ingroup characteristics to negative and positive ambiguous targets. Studies 1 and 2 investigated events involving negative targets whose status as racial (Tsarnaev brothers) or national (Woolwich attackers) ingroup members remained ambiguous. Immediately following the attacks, we presented White Americans and British individuals with the suspects’ images. Those higher in social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)—concerned with enforcing status boundaries and adherence to ingroup norms, respectively—perceived these low status and low conformity suspects as looking less White and less British, thus denying them ingroup characteristics. Perceiving suspects in more exclusionary terms increased support for treating them harshly, and for militaristic counter-terrorism policies prioritizing ingroup safety over outgroup harm. Studies 3 and 4 experimentally manipulated a racially ambiguous target’s status and conformity. Results suggested that target status and conformity critically influence SDO’s (status) and RWA’s (conformity) effects on inclusionary versus exclusionary perceptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1231-1247
Number of pages17
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 8 2014

Keywords

  • group categorization
  • hypodescent
  • ingroup overexclusion
  • right-wing authoritarianism
  • social dominance orientation
  • terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '“Not One of Us”: Predictors and Consequences of Denying Ingroup Characteristics to Ambiguous Targets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this