Not so lonely at the top: The relationship between power and loneliness

Adam Waytz*, Eileen Y. Chou, Joe C. Magee, Adam D. Galinsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eight studies found a robust negative relationship between the experience of power and the experience of loneliness. Dispositional power and loneliness were negatively correlated (Study 1). Experimental inductions established causality: we manipulated high versus low power through autobiographical essays, assignment to positions, or control over resources, and found that each manipulation showed that high versus low power decreased loneliness (Studies 2a-2c). We also demonstrated both that low power can increase loneliness and that high power can decrease loneliness by comparing these conditions to a baseline condition (Studies 3-4, 6). Furthermore, we establish a key mechanism that explains this effect, demonstrating that the need to belong mediates the effect of power on loneliness (Studies 5-6). These findings help explain some effects of power on social cognition, offer insights into organizational well-being and motivation, and speak to the fundamental question of whether it is "lonely at the top" or lonelier at the bottom.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-78
Number of pages10
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume130
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Loneliness
Power (Psychology)
Causality
Cognition
Motivation

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • Loneliness
  • Power
  • Social processes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Waytz, Adam ; Chou, Eileen Y. ; Magee, Joe C. ; Galinsky, Adam D. / Not so lonely at the top : The relationship between power and loneliness. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2015 ; Vol. 130. pp. 69-78.
@article{a6b728703344439d85cbc7e178a6e1b6,
title = "Not so lonely at the top: The relationship between power and loneliness",
abstract = "Eight studies found a robust negative relationship between the experience of power and the experience of loneliness. Dispositional power and loneliness were negatively correlated (Study 1). Experimental inductions established causality: we manipulated high versus low power through autobiographical essays, assignment to positions, or control over resources, and found that each manipulation showed that high versus low power decreased loneliness (Studies 2a-2c). We also demonstrated both that low power can increase loneliness and that high power can decrease loneliness by comparing these conditions to a baseline condition (Studies 3-4, 6). Furthermore, we establish a key mechanism that explains this effect, demonstrating that the need to belong mediates the effect of power on loneliness (Studies 5-6). These findings help explain some effects of power on social cognition, offer insights into organizational well-being and motivation, and speak to the fundamental question of whether it is {"}lonely at the top{"} or lonelier at the bottom.",
keywords = "Leadership, Loneliness, Power, Social processes",
author = "Adam Waytz and Chou, {Eileen Y.} and Magee, {Joe C.} and Galinsky, {Adam D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "69--78",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Not so lonely at the top : The relationship between power and loneliness. / Waytz, Adam; Chou, Eileen Y.; Magee, Joe C.; Galinsky, Adam D.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 130, 01.09.2015, p. 69-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not so lonely at the top

T2 - The relationship between power and loneliness

AU - Waytz, Adam

AU - Chou, Eileen Y.

AU - Magee, Joe C.

AU - Galinsky, Adam D.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Eight studies found a robust negative relationship between the experience of power and the experience of loneliness. Dispositional power and loneliness were negatively correlated (Study 1). Experimental inductions established causality: we manipulated high versus low power through autobiographical essays, assignment to positions, or control over resources, and found that each manipulation showed that high versus low power decreased loneliness (Studies 2a-2c). We also demonstrated both that low power can increase loneliness and that high power can decrease loneliness by comparing these conditions to a baseline condition (Studies 3-4, 6). Furthermore, we establish a key mechanism that explains this effect, demonstrating that the need to belong mediates the effect of power on loneliness (Studies 5-6). These findings help explain some effects of power on social cognition, offer insights into organizational well-being and motivation, and speak to the fundamental question of whether it is "lonely at the top" or lonelier at the bottom.

AB - Eight studies found a robust negative relationship between the experience of power and the experience of loneliness. Dispositional power and loneliness were negatively correlated (Study 1). Experimental inductions established causality: we manipulated high versus low power through autobiographical essays, assignment to positions, or control over resources, and found that each manipulation showed that high versus low power decreased loneliness (Studies 2a-2c). We also demonstrated both that low power can increase loneliness and that high power can decrease loneliness by comparing these conditions to a baseline condition (Studies 3-4, 6). Furthermore, we establish a key mechanism that explains this effect, demonstrating that the need to belong mediates the effect of power on loneliness (Studies 5-6). These findings help explain some effects of power on social cognition, offer insights into organizational well-being and motivation, and speak to the fundamental question of whether it is "lonely at the top" or lonelier at the bottom.

KW - Leadership

KW - Loneliness

KW - Power

KW - Social processes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936791598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936791598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84936791598

VL - 130

SP - 69

EP - 78

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

ER -