Notes from the resistance: some comments on Sally Haslanger’s Resisting Reality

Charles W. Mills*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

After a brief summary of the 17 essays in Sally Haslanger’s (2012) collection, Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique, I raise questions in two areas, the defense of constructionism and the definition of gender and race in terms of social oppression. I cite Robin Andreasen’s and Philip Kitcher’s essays arguing (in different ways) that races are both biologically real and socially constructed, and also Joshua Glasgow’s claim that constructionist arguments ultimately fail. I then cite Jennifer Saul’s critique that “oppression” definitions of gender and race run into problematic counterexamples, and add some other points arising from the different histories of gender and racial categories and realities. As someone sympathetic to constructionism myself, my aim is not a critique of Haslanger but rather an inquiry as to how she thinks (we) constructionists should answer such challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-97
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume171
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Keywords

  • Oppression definitions of race
  • Race
  • Sally Haslanger
  • Social constructionism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Notes from the resistance: some comments on Sally Haslanger’s Resisting Reality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this